Force Majeure in Gulf Construction Contracts Amid Iran Conflict
Summary
This client alert from King & Spalding discusses force majeure clauses in Gulf construction contracts in response to the Iran conflict. It outlines typical contractual regimes, legal implications, and provides practical advice for employers and contractors facing supply chain and logistical disruptions.
What changed
This client alert from King & Spalding addresses the implications of the Iran conflict on force majeure clauses within Gulf construction contracts. It highlights that the conflict is causing significant disruptions to supply chains and logistics, leading employers to anticipate force majeure claims from contractors. The document details the typical requirements for an event to qualify as force majeure under FIDIC-based contracts, including being beyond the party's control, unforeseeable, unavoidable, and not attributable to the other party. It also notes that contracts often list specific qualifying events such as war and hostilities.
For construction firms and employers operating in the Gulf region, this guidance emphasizes the critical need to understand their specific contractual provisions and applicable governing laws. Early and informed engagement with potential force majeure claims is advised to protect project timelines and commercial positions. The alert suggests that lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic may be applicable. King & Spalding offers support to clients in navigating these challenges.
What to do next
- Review existing construction contracts for force majeure clauses and governing law provisions.
- Assess the impact of regional disruptions on supply chains and logistics.
- Prepare to formally notify parties of potential force majeure claims if contract performance is affected.
Source document (simplified)
March 9, 2026
Force Majeure in Gulf Construction Contracts — Responding to Regional Disruption
Fahad Alarfaj, Amani Al Ali, Ibrahim Alkhudair, Sam Anastasiou, Tim Burbury, Almiro Clere, Phil Loynes, Sam Muir, Yousef Al Wazzan, Benjamin Williams King & Spalding + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed
In light of recent events in the Middle East, this Client Alert explores typical force majeure regimes in construction contracts focusing on typical clauses, governing law implications, key considerations and practical tips and recommendations for participants in the construction sector.
9 March 2026
The current conflict in Iran is causing significant disruption across the Gulf. In the context of construction projects, we are already seeing disruptions to supply chains, with pronounced impacts on logistics including severely limited transport routes and reduced cargo and shipment availability.
Against this backdrop, Employers should expect Contractors to begin (or at least be considering) raising Force Majeure claims if their performance of their contract has been impacted. Memories of disruptions from Covid-19 will be fresh and some of lessons learned can be applied in the current situation.
It is essential for Employers and Contractors to fully understand the contractual processes governing such claims, the applicable legal regimes, the practical consequences of Force Majeure events, and the key considerations that will shape their response strategy. Early and informed engagement with these issues will be critical to protecting project timelines and commercial positions.
King and Spalding’s construction and disputes team is supporting clients in the Middle East to navigate these challenges. With offices in the United Arab Emirates and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, we offer full value chain support combining international construction expertise with deep regional knowledge. Our team can assist at every stage of the process, from initial claim assessment through to dispute resolution.
Typical Construction Contract Force Majeure Regimes
There is no universal Force Majeure regime in construction contracts. Each contract contains its own framework, and Employers and Contractors will need to review their specific agreements carefully. That said, most construction contracts in the Gulf region are based on, or influenced by, FIDIC standard forms. These typically contain similar tests for establishing a Force Majeure event.
Under a typical FIDIC-based contract regime, for an event or circumstance to qualify as “Force Majeure” (or an “Exceptional Event” in more recent versions), it must satisfy each of the following requirements:
- The event must be beyond the affected party's control.
- The event must be one that could not reasonably have been provided against before the contract was entered into.
- Once the event has arisen, it must be unavoidable or not reasonably capable of being overcome.
- The event must not be substantially attributable to the other party. Many contracts also include specific examples of qualifying events, these typically include:
- War and hostilities.
- Invasion and acts of foreign enemies.
- Rebellion, revolution, and civil war.
- Riot, commotion, and disorder. Contracts often require that such events occur within the country where the works are being performed. Employers and Contractors should pay close attention to any geographical limitations in their contracts, as these may affect whether the current regional disruption qualifies.
The procedural requirements for Force Majeure claims are equally important. The affected party is typically required to give notice upon becoming aware of the event, detailing the nature of the event and its impact on the party's contractual obligations. This notice must usually be provided within a prescribed timeframe. Under FIDIC's default provisions, notice must be given within 14 days of the party becoming aware (or should have become aware) of the relevant event or circumstance. Failure to comply with notice requirements can be fatal to a claim.
The key consequences and obligations under a typical Force Majeure regime include:
- Relief available: This is usually limited to an extension of time in the Gulf region. In some contracts, particularly those distinguishing between general/natural Force Majeure and "Political" Force Majeure (also called an “Employer’s Risk Event”), cost relief may also be available for certain qualifying events.
- Mitigation obligation: The affected party must take all reasonable steps to minimise the impact of the Force Majeure event and to overcome its effects. This obligation continues throughout the duration of the event. Claims that fail to demonstrate adequate mitigation efforts are vulnerable to challenge.
- Prolonged Force Majeure: If the event continues for an extended period, either party may acquire the right to terminate the contract. Under FIDIC, prolonged Force Majeure lasting a continuous 84 days or more or a total period of 140 days due to the same event, may trigger termination rights. Employers and Contractors should review their contracts carefully to understand what relief is potentially available and be aware of termination thresholds.
Governing Law Implications
The applicable governing law can also be relevant. Contractors can usually bring claims under both contract and statutory law, especially if a contract does not contain a Force Majeure clause or is considered insufficient.
The key provisions in the UAE and Saudi Arabia (noting the below is not an exhaustive summary) are:
- In the UAE, the Civil Code requires a narrow impossibility standard. Mere financial hardship or increased costs will not satisfy the test, instead performance must be rendered genuinely impossible (i.e. not merely more difficult or expensive). In situations where performance is still technically possible but has become excessively burdensome due to exceptional events, courts may intervene to rebalance obligations. The typical remedy is rescission of the contract rather than interim monetary relief or adjustment of obligations.
- In Saudi Arabia, the Civil Transaction Law (CTL) codifies a standard of “ impossibility of execution”. If the execution of the obligation becomes impossible for a reason beyond the control of one party, its obligation and the other party’s corresponding obligation is canceled, and the contract is rescinded. Further, if the impossibility is partial, the obligation is voided in so as far as it relates to the elements of the contract impaired by such impossibility, and the other party’s corresponding obligation in respect of that part is also to be voided. The application of these regimes tends to be highly specific to the facts in question. Further advice should be sought on any particular claim in question.
Key considerations
- Early triage is essential. Prompt assessment allows Employers to preserve project timelines, contain cost claims, and, where appropriate, agree pragmatic resequencing or balanced adjustments with Contractors. A proactive approach is far preferable to reactive dispute management.
Causation and evidence are central. There must be a direct causal link between the Force Majeure event and the Contractor's inability to perform. Employers should scrutinise claims carefully and request detailed evidence demonstrating precisely how the regional disruption has prevented or delayed performance of the Contractor’s obligations. Examples of impacts that may qualify include:
- Inability to import materials due to closed shipping routes;
- Demobilisation of workforce due to security concerns;
- Suspension of manufacturing at overseas suppliers; and
- Closure of ports or border crossings. Claims based on general market uncertainty or anticipated future difficulties may not qualify, and should be examined critically.
Notice compliance is mandatory. Contractors who fail to provide timely and compliant notices may forfeit their entitlement to relief. Employers should:
- Maintain detailed records of all notices received; and
- Assess compliance rigorously against contractual requirements and respond appropriately to deficient notices.
Mitigation is not optional. Contractors are obliged to take all reasonable steps to minimise the impact of Force Majeure events. Employers should request evidence of the Contractor’s mitigation efforts and challenge claims where adequate steps have not been taken.
Consider the broader consequences. If the disruption is prolonged, termination rights may be triggered. Employers should be aware of the length of disruption that would give rise to a termination right, and be aware of the risks and opportunities of doing so:
- Short-term commercial considerations should be weighed against longer-term project objectives and relationship management.
- In some circumstances, a Force Majeure event may provide a legitimate exit from a project that has become commercially unviable.
- In others, preserving the Contractor relationship and finding pragmatic solutions will be the priority. Each situation must be assessed on its own facts.
Practical Steps and Recommendations
Employers and Contractors should consider taking the following practical steps in response to the current regional disruption:
- Compile and maintain a comprehensive evidence trail. Document the impact of the disruption on your projects, including records of supply chain delays, transport disruptions, and communications with Employers, Contractors and suppliers. Continue to monitor the evolving situation and update your records accordingly.
- Review and monitor all contractual processes and requirements. Identify the applicable Force Majeure provisions, notice periods, and procedural requirements in each of your contracts. Establish internal systems to track incoming notices, assess claims and ensure timely responses.
- Consider engaging with counterparties early. Proactive dialogue between Employers, Contractors and suppliers can help identify practical solutions, manage expectations, and reduce the risk of adversarial disputes. Early engagement also provides an opportunity to clarify the evidence required to support any claims and to remind contractors of their mitigation obligations.
- Seek legal advice promptly. The interaction between contractual provisions and applicable governing law can be complex. Early legal input will help ensure that your response is both commercially sensible and legally robust. Send Print Report ### Related Posts
- Texas Magistrate Judge Recommends Summary Judgment Against Texas Wind Farm on Winter Storm Uri Force Majeure Claims
- COVID as a Force Majeure Event - An Interesting and Unexpected Development in Singapore
- Cyberattack and Ransomware Attack Force Majeure Considerations
Latest Posts
- COVID Relief Funds Improperly Used By Nearly Half of Hospitals, OIG Audit Shows
- Force Majeure in Gulf Construction Contracts — Responding to Regional Disruption See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
King & Spalding
Written by:
King & Spalding Contact + Follow Fahad Alarfaj + Follow Amani Al Ali + Follow Ibrahim Alkhudair + Follow Sam Anastasiou + Follow Tim Burbury + Follow Almiro Clere + Follow Phil Loynes + Follow Sam Muir + Follow Yousef Al Wazzan + Follow Benjamin Williams + Follow more less
What do you want from legal thought leadership?
Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:
Published In:
Construction Contracts + Follow Construction Industry + Follow Contract Disputes + Follow Dispute Resolution Clauses + Follow FIDIC Contracts + Follow Force Majeure Clause + Follow Risk Mitigation + Follow Saudi Arabia + Follow Supply Chain + Follow United Arab Emirates (UAE) + Follow General Business + Follow Construction + Follow International Trade + Follow more less
King & Spalding on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Trade & Export alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Trade Law publishes new changes.