Jonathan Aguirre v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

FL District Court of Appeal Opinions

Filed March 11th, 2026

Detected March 12th, 2026

Summary

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court's decision in the criminal appeal case of Jonathan Aguirre v. State of Florida. The opinion was filed on March 11, 2026, and the disposition was 'Affirmed'.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The District Court of Appeal of Florida issued an opinion affirming the lower tribunal's decision in the case of Jonathan Aguirre v. State of Florida, docket number 3D25-0838. The appeal was conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, and the court cited Kocaker v. State for its reasoning. The disposition of the case was 'Affirmed'.

This is a final appellate decision that upholds the lower court's ruling. For legal professionals and criminal defendants involved in similar appeals, this affirms the standard of review for jury verdicts where substantial, competent evidence supports the verdict. No new compliance actions or deadlines are imposed by this specific ruling.

Source document (simplified)

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 11, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Jonathan Aguirre v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Citations: None known
Docket Number: 3D2025-0838
Disposition: Affirmed
Opinion
Authorities (2)
Cited By (0)
Summaries (0)
Similar Cases (0)
PDF

Disposition

Affirmed

Combined Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida

Opinion filed March 11, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D25-0838
Lower Tribunal No. M24-25383A

Jonathan Aguirre,
Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida,
Appellee.

An Appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 783
(1967), from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Michelle Marie
Urbistondo, Judge.

Jonathan Aguirre, in proper person.

Jame Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Lourdes B. Fernandez,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LOGUE and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Kocaker v. State, 119 So. 3d 1214, 1227 (Fla. 2013)

(“[I]t is ‘the jury’s duty to determine whether the evidence is sufficient to

exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence beyond a reasonable

doubt. Where there is substantial, competent evidence to support the jury

verdict, that determination will not be disturbed by the courts.’” (quoting

Durousseau v. State, 55 So. 3d 543, 557 (Fla. 2010))).