Michael J. Cardone v. Patricia Starling - Civil Appeal
Summary
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court's decision in the case of Michael J. Cardone v. Patricia Starling. The opinion was filed on March 11, 2026, under docket number 4D2025-1380.
What changed
The Florida District Court of Appeal issued an opinion affirming the lower court's disposition in the civil case Michael J. Cardone v. Patricia Starling, et al. The appeal, bearing docket number 4D2025-1380, was decided on March 11, 2026, with the appellate court affirming the county court's decision.
This ruling signifies the final disposition of the appeal. For legal professionals involved in this specific case, the affirmation means the lower court's judgment stands. No new compliance actions are mandated by this opinion, as it pertains to a specific legal dispute and does not introduce new regulatory requirements or penalties.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 11, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Michael J. Cardone v. Patricia Starling, Starling Cleaning Services Tile Designs & More, LLC
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 4D2025-1380
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
MICHAEL J. CARDONE,
Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA STARLING and STARLING CLEANING SERVICES TILE
DESIGNS & MORE LLC,
Appellees.
No. 4D2025-1380
[March 11, 2026]
Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
Beach County; Ori F. Silver, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502024SC013881.
Michael J. Cardone, North Palm Beach, pro se.
No appearance for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See, inter alia, A.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 958 So.
2d 606, 607 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“In the absence of an adequate transcript
on appeal, a judgment that is not fundamentally erroneous must be
affirmed.”) (cleaned up) (quotation omitted).
GROSS, CIKLIN and LOTT, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.