Jump To

Top Caption Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 11, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

People v. Vasquez CA6

California Court of Appeal

• Citations: None known
• Docket Number: H053646

• Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

• Opinion

• Authorities (0)

• Cited By (0)

• Summaries (0)

• Similar Cases (0)

• PDF

Combined Opinion

Filed 3/11/26 P. v. Vasquez CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

              IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                                  SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H053646
(Monterey County
Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. Nos. 25CR002764,
25PS000043)
v.

JAVIER VASQUEZ,

         Defendant and Appellant.

     Defendant Javier Vasquez pleaded no contest to second degree burglary (Pen.

Code, § 459) in case number 25CR002764 and admitted he violated postrelease
community supervision (PRCS) in case number 25PS000043.1 On appeal, Vasquez’s
counsel has filed a brief which states the case but raises no issues, asking this court to
conduct an independent review under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).
We advised Vasquez of his right to submit written argument on his own behalf within
30 days, and he has not done so. Having independently reviewed the record, we conclude
there are no arguable issues on appeal.
In December 2023, Vasquez was placed on PRCS for a period of two years eight
months for driving in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property
while fleeing from a pursuing police officer (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a)).

     1
         Unspecified statutory references are to the Penal Code.
   In April 2025, the Monterey County District Attorney filed a complaint in case

number 25CR002764 charging Vasquez with second degree burglary (§ 459; count 1),
receiving stolen property exceeding $950 (§ 496, subd. (a); count 2), misdemeanor
possession of burglar’s tools (§ 466; count 3), and misdemeanor identity theft (§ 530.5,
subd. (c)(1); count 4). Vasquez had been stopped in a car that was seen on surveillance
video near another car that was burglarized, and a search of Vasquez’s car yielded
multiple car keys, cell phones, and other items.
When arrested for these latest offenses, Vasquez was the subject of an outstanding
warrant for failing to report to the probation department for his PRCS. That same month,
the probation department petitioned to revoke Vasquez’s PRCS (case number
25PS000043), both for his failure to report and for his failure to obey all laws.
In July 2025, Vasquez admitted he violated PRCS in case number 25PS000043.
He also pleaded no contest to second degree burglary (count 1) in case number
25CR002764 and admitted as an aggravating factor that his prior performance on PRCS
was unsatisfactory. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 4.421(b)(5).)
The following month, the trial court sentenced Vasquez in case number
25CR002764 under the agreed term of three years in prison. Vasquez was given 89 days
of custody credit, composed of 45 actual days and 44 days of conduct credit. The
remaining counts in 25CR002764 were dismissed. The trial court ordered Vasquez to
pay a local crime prevention fine plus penalty assessments of $41, a court operations
assessment of $40, a court facilities assessment of $30, a $450 restitution fine, and an
additional $450 parole revocation restitution fine that was suspended.
For case number 25PS000043, the trial court terminated Vasquez’s PRCS and
ordered that he serve a term of 180 days in county jail, consecutive to his sentence in case
number 25CR002764. Vasquez was given 180 days of custody credit, composed of
90 actual days and 90 days of conduct credit, and was ordered to pay a previously
suspended $600 parole revocation restitution fine.

                                         2
   Having independently reviewed the record under Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, we

find no arguable issues.
The judgment is affirmed.

                                      3
                                     ____________________________________
                                     LIE, Acting P. J.

WE CONCUR:

WILSON, J.

CHUNG, J.

People v. Vasquez
H053646

  
     Judge of the Santa Clara County Superior Court assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to

article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.