Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 10, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Curtis J. Mooney v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

• Citations: None known
• Docket Number: A26A1401

• Disposition: Dismissed

• Opinion

• Authorities (2)

• Cited By (0)

• Summaries (0)

• Similar Cases (12.4K)

• PDF

Disposition

Dismissed

Combined Opinion

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________
March 10, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26A1401. CURTIS J. MOONEY v. THE STATE.

In November 2013, Curtis J. Mooney pled guilty to multiple offenses, including
aggravated child molestation, aggravated sodomy, aggravated sexual battery, and child
molestation. In August 2025, Mooney filed a motion for leave to file an out-of-time
appeal, which the trial court denied on August 25, 2025. Mooney then filed a motion
for leave to file an out-of-time notice of appeal, which the trial court also denied.
Mooney then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
In Cook v. State, 313 Ga. 471, 506 (5) (870 SE2d 758) (2022), the Supreme Court
of Georgia determined that a trial court lacks authority to grant an out-of-time appeal,
and that any remedy involving an out-of-time appeal must be sought in habeas corpus.
There, the Supreme Court vacated the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s
motion for out-of-time appeal and remanded with instructions to dismiss the motion.
Id. In response, the legislature enacted OCGA § 5-6-39.1, which became effective on
May 14, 2025. This statute allows for a defendant to seek out-of-time relief if (1) the
defendant moves for leave to file an out-of-time motion for new trial or notice of
appeal within 100 days from the expiration of the time period for the filing of such
motion or notice, or (2) the defendant had an out-of-time motion or appeal dismissed
under Cook.
OCGA § 5-6-39.1(b) does not apply to Mooney as he neither filed a motion for
out-of-time appeal within 100 days from the expiration of the time period for filing a
notice of appeal nor had a motion for out-of-time appeal dismissed under Cook.
Because Mooney is not entitled to pursue out-of-time relief, the propriety of the trial
court’s ruling on his requests for an out-of-time appeal is moot. See Carlock v. Kmart
Corp., 227 Ga. App. 356, 361 (3)(a) (489 SE2d 99) (1997) (a moot issue is one where
a ruling is sought on a matter that has no practical effect on the alleged controversy or
where the issues have ceased to exist). Accordingly, this appeal is hereby
DISMISSED. See OCGA § 5-6-48(b)(3) (providing for dismissal of an appeal when
the questions presented have become moot).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
03/10/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.