KIMMIYAA, LLC v. COFFEE BIANCO, LLC - Case Dismissed
Summary
The Court of Appeals of Georgia dismissed the appeal in KIMMIYAA, LLC v. COFFEE BIANCO, LLC due to the appellant's failure to timely file required documents. The dismissal follows a prior jury verdict in favor of Coffee Bianco and an award of attorney fees.
What changed
The Court of Appeals of Georgia has dismissed the appeal filed by KIMMIYAA, LLC, Ali Fathi, Scott R. King, and Scott King & Associates, LLC (collectively “Kimmiyaa”) in their case against Coffee Bianco, LLC and Zara Foroutan (collectively “Coffee Bianco”). The dismissal is based on Kimmiyaa's failure to comply with court orders regarding the timely filing of their enumeration of errors and appellate brief, even after an extension was granted. This action follows a jury verdict in favor of Coffee Bianco on claims including breach of contract and fraud, and an award of attorney fees to Coffee Bianco.
This dismissal signifies the final resolution of Kimmiyaa's appeal regarding the attorney fee award. Regulated entities and legal professionals involved in litigation should note the strict adherence required for appellate filing deadlines and court orders. Failure to comply, as demonstrated in this case, can lead to the dismissal of appeals, potentially resulting in the finality of adverse judgments and awards.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 6, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
KIMMIYAA, LLC v. COFFEE BIANCO, LLC
Court of Appeals of Georgia
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: A25A2199
Disposition: Dismissed
Disposition
Dismissed
Combined Opinion
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
March 06, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A25A2199. KIMMIYAA, LLC et al. v. COFFEE BIANCO, LLC et al.
Kimmiyaa, LLC, Ali Fathi, Scott R. King, and Scott King & Associates, LLC
d/b/a SK Law Group (collectively “Kimmiyaa”) sued Coffee Bianco, LLC and Zara
Foroutan (collectively “Coffee Bianco”) for breach of contract, conversion, fraud,
and other claims. After a jury found in Coffee Bianco’s favor on all claims, Coffee
Bianco received an award of attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14(a) and (b). We
granted Kimmiyaa’s application for discretionary appeal from the fee award on
November 6, 2024, and ordered Kimmiyaa to file a notice of appeal within 10 days.
Kimmiyaa filed its notice of appeal 19 days later, on November 25, 2024. We
dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Kimmiyaa moved for reconsideration,
asserting that it had timely e-filed a notice of appeal but that the trial court had
rejected it because of typographical errors. Kimmiyaa asserted that it had submitted
a corrected notice of appeal on November 25, 2024, which the trial court deemed
timely. We granted the motion for reconsideration and reinstated the case.
Following reinstatement on September 19, 2025, Kimmiyaa’s enumeration of
errors and appellate brief were due October 9, 2025, pursuant to Court of Appeals
Rule 23(a). On October 6, 2025, Kimmiyaa sought an extension of time in which to
file. We granted an extension until October 15, 2025, specifically providing in the
order that: “Failure to file by 4:30 p.m. on that date shall result in dismissal of
[Kimmiyaa’s] appeal. See Tolbert v. Tolbert, 234 Ga. 708 (217 SE2d 162) (1975)[.]”
(Emphasis added).
Kimmiyaa did not file its enumeration of errors and appellate brief until after
this deadline had passed. Kimmiyaa attempted to file at 4:32 p.m. on October 15,
2025, but because its filing contained an erroneous case number, the Clerk’s Office
rejected the filing. Kimmiyaa then filed an enumeration of errors and appellate brief
at 9:23 a.m. on October 16, 2025.
Kimmiyaa “has failed to comply with [our] order or offer any reason for failing
to comply with the order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed[.]” Clark v. Green, 248
Ga. 769 (285 SE2d 729) (1982) (dismissing appeal for failure to timely file
enumeration of errors and brief in violation of court order); Tolbert, 234 Ga. at 708;
Taylor v. Columbia County Planning Comm’n, 232 Ga. 155, 155-56, 158 (205 SE2d 287)
(1974) (dismissing appeal after appellant was ordered to file brief and enumeration of
errors no later than December 10, 1973, but filed brief on December 11, and
enumeration of errors on December 13, 1973); Seigler v. Smith, 228 Ga. 270 (185 SE2d
377) (1971) (dismissing appeal for late-filed enumeration of errors and brief where
appellant “failed to perfect the appeal” without showing providential cause); Court
of Appeals Rule 23(a).
Accordingly, Coffee Bianco’s motion to dismiss this appeal is hereby
GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED.
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia
A25A2199. KIMMIYAA, LLC v. COFFEE BIANCO, LLC et al.
MCFADDEN, Presiding Judge, dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
We undoubtedly have authority to sanction violations of our orders and to
dispose of appeals that have been abandoned. But the General Assembly has withheld
from us authority to impose the ultimate sanction of dismissal for tardy briefing. See
OCGA § 5-6-48(b). See also Shouse v. Shouse, 376 Ga. App. 422 (919 SE2d 98) (2025)
(McFadden, P.J., dissenting).
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
03/06/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when GA Court of Appeals Opinions publishes new changes.