Changeflow GovPing State Courts Orr v. State of Florida - Petition for Writ of ...
Routine Enforcement Removed Final

Orr v. State of Florida - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Filed March 4th, 2026
Detected March 5th, 2026
Email

Summary

The District Court of Appeal of Florida dismissed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by Grant D. Orr. The court cited a prior ruling that a criminal defendant generally cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel.

What changed

The District Court of Appeal of Florida, in the case of Orr v. State of Florida (Docket No. 1D2025-2260), has dismissed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The dismissal is based on the principle that a criminal defendant cannot typically represent themselves while they have legal counsel, referencing the Logan v. State precedent.

This ruling means the petitioner's habeas corpus petition has been denied on procedural grounds. Legal professionals and criminal defendants should note this precedent regarding pro se representation when counsel is already involved in a case. No specific compliance actions or deadlines are imposed by this court order.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 4, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Orr v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Disposition

Dismissed

Combined Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA


No. 1D2025-2260


GRANT D. ORR,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.


Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

March 4, 2026

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003)
(holding that generally, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro
se while represented by counsel).

BILBREY, NORDBY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.


Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.


Grant D. Orr, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

2

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Federal and State Courts
Filed
March 4th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Criminal defendants Legal professionals
Geographic scope
State (Florida)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Criminal Procedure Habeas Corpus

Get State Courts alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.