Changeflow GovPing State Courts Kevin L. Smith v. State of Florida - Affirmatio...
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

Kevin L. Smith v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Order

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Filed March 4th, 2026
Detected March 5th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a rule 3.850 motion in the case of Kevin L. Smith v. State of Florida. The court's decision was issued on March 4, 2026, with docket number 4D2025-2332.

What changed

The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, has affirmed the lower court's decision in Kevin L. Smith v. State of Florida, case number 4D2025-2332. The appellate court upheld the denial of a rule 3.850 motion, which typically pertains to post-conviction relief. The disposition was issued on March 4, 2026.

This ruling means the appellant's request for relief has been denied at the appellate level. For legal professionals and criminal defendants involved in similar post-conviction proceedings in Florida, this affirmation reinforces the precedent set by cited cases and indicates that the lower court's order was upheld. No new compliance actions or deadlines are imposed by this specific court order, as it pertains to the final disposition of an existing legal matter.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 4, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Kevin L. Smith v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Disposition

Affirmed

Combined Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

KEVIN L. SMITH,
Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2332

[March 4, 2026]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Peter Holden, Judge;
L.T. Case No. 17-002407CF10A.

Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531, 532 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023),
rev. granted 2024 WL 1796831 (Fla. April 25, 2024); Wainwright v. State,
411 So. 3d 392, 399 (Fla. 2025).

GROSS, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.


Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Federal and State Courts
Filed
March 4th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Courts Criminal defendants Legal professionals
Geographic scope
State (Florida)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Criminal Justice
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure Post-Conviction Relief

Get State Courts alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.