Kevin L. Smith v. State of Florida - Affirmation of Order
Summary
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed an order denying a rule 3.850 motion in the case of Kevin L. Smith v. State of Florida. The court's decision was issued on March 4, 2026, with docket number 4D2025-2332.
What changed
The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, has affirmed the lower court's decision in Kevin L. Smith v. State of Florida, case number 4D2025-2332. The appellate court upheld the denial of a rule 3.850 motion, which typically pertains to post-conviction relief. The disposition was issued on March 4, 2026.
This ruling means the appellant's request for relief has been denied at the appellate level. For legal professionals and criminal defendants involved in similar post-conviction proceedings in Florida, this affirmation reinforces the precedent set by cited cases and indicates that the lower court's order was upheld. No new compliance actions or deadlines are imposed by this specific court order, as it pertains to the final disposition of an existing legal matter.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 4, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Kevin L. Smith v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 4D2025-2332
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
KEVIN L. SMITH,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2332
[March 4, 2026]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Peter Holden, Judge;
L.T. Case No. 17-002407CF10A.
Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Paul Edward Petillo, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531, 532 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023),
rev. granted 2024 WL 1796831 (Fla. April 25, 2024); Wainwright v. State,
411 So. 3d 392, 399 (Fla. 2025).
GROSS, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.