Daniels v. State of Florida - Dismissed Appeal
Summary
The Florida District Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal in Daniels v. State of Florida, citing a lack of finality in the lower court's order. The dismissal is based on a prior ruling where a claim was struck as legally insufficient with leave to amend.
What changed
The District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, has dismissed the appeal in Mario Daniels v. State of Florida (Docket No. 1D2025-2567). The dismissal is based on the precedent set in Shelley v. State, which held that an order lacking finality, particularly when a claim is struck with leave to amend, is not appealable.
This ruling signifies the closure of this specific appellate proceeding. For legal professionals and parties involved in litigation within Florida's state courts, this reinforces the importance of ensuring lower court orders are final and appealable before filing an appeal. No specific compliance actions are required for regulated entities, as this is a judicial decision on a specific case.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 4, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Daniels v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 1D2025-2567
Disposition: Dismissed
Disposition
Dismissed
Combined Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2025-2567
MARIO DANIELS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.
Mark E. Feagle, Judge.
March 4, 2026
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Shelley v. State, 993 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA
2008) (finding order lacked finality because the circuit court struck
one of the claims as legally insufficient with leave to amend).
BILBREY, NORDBY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
Mario Daniels, pro se, Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.