People v. O'Connor - Appellate Division Opinion

New York Appellate Division

Filed March 3rd, 2026

Detected March 4th, 2026

Summary

The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County, in the case of People v. O'Connor. The court found the sentence imposed on the defendant-appellant not to be excessive.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

This document is an opinion from the Appellate Division, First Department, of the New York Supreme Court, affirming a judgment against Talounzo O'Connor. The appeal concerned a judgment rendered by the Supreme Court, Bronx County, on January 26, 2022. The appellate court reviewed the case, heard arguments, and found no grounds to overturn the lower court's decision, specifically stating that the sentence was not excessive.

This ruling represents a final decision in the appellate process for this specific case. For legal professionals involved in criminal defense or prosecution in New York, this opinion may serve as precedent or provide insight into the appellate court's review standards for sentencing in similar cases. No new compliance obligations or deadlines are imposed by this judicial decision; it pertains to the resolution of a specific legal dispute.

Source document (simplified)

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 3, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Add Note

People v. O'Connor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Citations: 2026 NY Slip Op 01157
Docket Number: Ind. No. 71153/21; Appeal No. 5980; Case No. 2022-00651
Opinion
Authorities (0)
Cited By (0)
Summaries (0)
Similar Cases (0)
PDF

Combined Opinion

People v O'Connor (2026 NY Slip Op 01157)
| People v O'Connor |
| 2026 NY Slip Op 01157 |
| Decided on March 03, 2026 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |

Decided and Entered: March 03, 2026
Before: Webber, J.P., Shulman, Higgitt, Rosado, Hagler, JJ.
Ind. No. 71153/21|Appeal No. 5980|Case No. 2022-00651|

*[1]The People of The State of New York, Respondent,

Talounzo O'Connor, Defendant-Appellant.**

Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Paris C. DeYoung of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Andrew J. Loizides of counsel), for respondent.

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Harold Adler, J.), rendered January 26, 2022,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: March 3, 2026

Counsel for appellant is referred to § 606.5, Rules of the Appellate Division, First Department.