Changeflow GovPing State Courts Curtis L. Duhart v. State of Florida - Criminal...
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

Curtis L. Duhart v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com FL District Court of Appeal Opinions
Filed March 3rd, 2026
Detected March 4th, 2026
Email

Summary

The District Court of Appeal of Florida affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Curtis L. Duhart v. State of Florida. The appeal, docketed as 5D2025-3143, concerned a criminal matter. The court's disposition was 'Affirmed'.

What changed

The District Court of Appeal of Florida has affirmed the lower court's decision in the criminal appeal case of Curtis L. Duhart v. State of Florida, identified by docket number 5D2025-3143. The appellate court's disposition was 'Affirmed', indicating no reversal or modification of the original judgment.

This ruling signifies the finalization of the appellate process for this specific case, with the lower court's decision being upheld. For legal professionals and criminal defendants involved in similar appeals, this outcome reinforces the importance of adhering to established legal procedures and standards of review. No new compliance actions or deadlines are imposed by this specific court order, as it pertains to the resolution of an existing legal dispute.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 3, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Curtis L. Duhart v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Disposition

Affirmed

Combined Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA


Case No. 5D2025-3143
L.T. Case No. 2025-105413-CFDB


CURTIS L. DUHART,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County.
A. Christian Miller, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich,
Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Curtis Lamont Duhart, Deland, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney
Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for
Appellee.

March 3, 2026

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, LAMBERT, and MACIVER, JJ., concur.


Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.


2

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Federal and State Courts
Filed
March 3rd, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Courts Legal professionals Criminal defendants
Geographic scope
State (Florida)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Criminal Justice
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure

Get State Courts alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.