Weeks v. Warner - Motion for Reconsideration Denied
Summary
The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals denied a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant-Appellant Eugene Warner in the case Weeks v. Warner. The court found the request to be untimely under the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure.
What changed
The Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals has issued an order denying a motion for reconsideration filed by Defendant-Appellant Eugene Warner in the case Weeks v. Warner (Docket Number CAAP-24-0000378). The court construed Warner's February 25, 2026 submissions as a request for reconsideration of the prior Order Dismissing Appeal entered on February 3, 2026. The court found the request to be untimely under Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a).
This ruling signifies the final disposition of Warner's attempt to have the dismissal order reconsidered. No further action is required from regulated entities as this is a specific court ruling on a procedural matter. The decision reinforces the importance of adhering to appellate procedure deadlines.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 2, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Weeks v. Warner
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
- Citations: None known
Docket Number: CAAP-24-0000378
Combined Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed
Intermediate Court of Appeals
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
02-MAR-2026
09:45 AM
Dkt. 97 ODMR
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
DEBRA A. WEEKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
EUGENE WARNER, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT
NORTH & SOUTH HILO DIVISION
(CASE NO. 3DRC-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
(By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.)
On February 3, 2026, the Intermediate Court of Appeals
entered the Order Dismissing Appeal. On February 25, 2026,
Defendant-Appellant Eugene Warner (Warner) filed "Notic [sic] of
Order from Republic's Notarial Protest Court to Hawaii
Democracy's De Facto Tribunal to be Reviewed En Banc," which is
difficult to discern, along with an exhibit and a Proof of
Service.
In light of the procedural posture of this case, and
upon review of the February 25, 2026 submissions and the entire
record on appeal, we construe these submissions as requesting
reconsideration of the February 3, 2026 Order Dismissing Appeal.
Warner's request for reconsideration is untimely. See
Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a). Therefore, IT
IS HEREBY ORDERED that Warner's request for reconsideration, as
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
well as any other relief requested in the February 25, 2026
submissions, are DENIED.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, March 2, 2026.
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone
Chief Judge
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard
Associate Judge
/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth
Associate Judge
2
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals publishes new changes.