City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston - Writ of Certiorari Dismissed
Summary
The Supreme Court of South Carolina has dismissed the writ of certiorari in the case of City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston. The court determined that the writ was improvidently granted, effectively ending the appellate review of the lower court's decision.
What changed
The Supreme Court of South Carolina has dismissed the writ of certiorari in the case City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston, appellate case no. 2023-000778. The court issued an opinion on January 21, 2026, stating that the writ was improvidently granted, which means the case will not proceed to further appellate review by this court.
This dismissal means the decision of the court of appeals in City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston, 439 S.C. 6, 885 S.E.2d 151 (Ct. App. 2023) stands as the final determination on the matter. For the parties involved, this signifies the conclusion of this particular avenue of appeal. No further action is required from regulated entities as this is a specific court ruling on a procedural matter.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Syllabus Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
Jan. 21, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston
Supreme Court of South Carolina
- Citations: None known
Docket Number: 2023-000778
Syllabus
We dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.
Combined Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
City of Charleston, Petitioner,
v.
City of North Charleston and Millbrook Plantation, LLC,
Respondents.
Appellate Case No. 2023-000778
Appeal from Charleston County
Eugene C. Griffith Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 28311
Heard April 1, 2025 – Filed January 21, 2026
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Frances Isaac Cantwell, of City of Charleston Legal
Department; Julia Parker Copeland, formerly of City of
Charleston Legal Department; Wilbur E. Johnson and
Russell Grainger Hines, of Clement Rivers, LLP, all of
Charleston, all for City of Charleston.
Bruce E. Miller, of Bruce E. Miller, P.A., of Mount
Pleasant, for Millbrook Plantation, LLC; David J. Parrish,
of Maynard Nexsen PC, of Charleston; and Kriston D.
Neely, of North Charleston, both for City of North
Charleston.
PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals'
decision in City of Charleston v. City of North Charleston, 439 S.C. 6, 885 S.E.2d
151 (Ct. App. 2023). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
KITTREDGE, C.J., FEW, JAMES, HILL and VERDIN, JJ., concur.
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get State Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when South Carolina Supreme Court publishes new changes.