Supreme Court affirms Chancery judgment in Fortiline v. McCall

Delaware Court Opinions

Filed February 10th, 2026

Detected February 11th, 2026

Summary

The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a judgment from the Court of Chancery in the case of Fortiline, Inc. and Patriot Supply Holdings, Inc. v. Hayne McCall et al. The Court's order stated that the judgment should be affirmed based on the reasoning provided in the Court of Chancery's memorandum opinion.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The Delaware Supreme Court has affirmed the Court of Chancery's judgment in the case of Fortiline, Inc. and Patriot Supply Holdings, Inc. v. Hayne McCall et al. The Supreme Court's order, issued on February 10, 2026, confirms that the lower court's decision, dated June 27, 2025, is to be upheld. This action represents the final decision in this appellate process.

This ruling is a final judicial determination. For legal professionals involved in this specific case, it signifies the conclusion of the appellate review. No new compliance actions or deadlines are imposed by this specific court order, as it pertains to the resolution of an existing legal dispute.

Source document (simplified)

IN THE SUPREME C OURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWA RE FO RTIL INE, IN C. an d PATR IOT § SUPPLY HOLDINGS, I NC. § § No. 300, 202 5 Plain tiff s Below, § Appel lant s, § Court Below — C ourt of Cha ncer y § of the S tate of De lawa re v. § § C.A. No. 20 24 - 0211 HAYNE MCCALL, CHR ISTOPHER § AN TOS, B RUCE ROBE RT S, § JEFFR EY T. JENKI NS, SI DNE Y C. § PETERSON III, CLIFFORD § SPAHN, JAME S R. COOK, JR., § TIMOTHY L. VANEG MOND, § ALAN HIBB ARD, D AVID S. § HORN, DAVID T. MCLEAN, § DAVID W. KING, E. TODD § O’TUEL, GREGOY F. WEINGA RT, § GREGO RY MCCLELLAND, JR., § JASO N A. W EISER, JOH N C. § WEST, LEMUEL MAZA and § SEAN P. STILLEY, § § Defe ndant s Below, § Appe llee s. § Submit ted: Januar y 28, 202 6 Decide d: Febr uary 10, 2026 Before SEIT Z, Chief Justic e; VALIHUR A, TRAYNOR, LEGRO W and GRIFFI THS, Justi ces, const itut ing th e Court e n banc. ORDE R This 10th day o f Febru ary, 202 6, after con side rati on of the par ties’ briefs, the argum ent of cou nse l, and the r ecor d on app eal, it ap pears t o the C ourt t hat the

2 judgm ent of the C ourt of C hance ry should be affirm ed on th e basis of and for the reas ons sta ted i n its memorandum opinion d ated Jun e 27, 202 5. 1 NOW, T HER EFOR E, IT I S ORD ERED that th e judgm ent o f the Cour t of Chanc ery be AF FIRM ED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Gary F. Traynor Justic e 1 Fortiline, Inc. v. McCall, 341 A.3d 1027 (Del. Ch. June 27, 2025).