Search

Hagy v. Southern Insurance Company of Virginia - Insurance Dispute

The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia granted Plaintiffs' motion to withdraw admissions and set aside the Defendant's motion for summary judgment in the case of Hagy v. Southern Insurance Company of Virginia. The court denied the defendant's motion without prejudice.

DVRO Reversed; Inmate's Right to Court Access Violated

The California Court of Appeal reversed a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) against an inmate, finding his right to court access was violated. The court failed to address the inmate's request for transportation or telephonic appearance, leading to a reversal and remand for proper proceedings.

GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal - Denial of Yearsley Protection Not Immediately Appealable

The Supreme Court ruled in GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal that a pretrial order denying a federal contractor 'Yearsley protection' is not immediately appealable. The Court held that the denial of this defense is not an immunity from suit, and thus does not qualify for interlocutory review under the collateral-order doctrine.

Villarreal v. Texas - Qualified Testimony Discussion Ban Affirmed

The Supreme Court affirmed a conviction in Villarreal v. Texas, holding that a qualified order prohibiting a testifying defendant from discussing their testimony during an overnight recess does not violate the Sixth Amendment. This ruling clarifies the balance between a defendant's right to counsel and the integrity of trial testimony.

Cooper v. State of California - Civil Rights Case

A new civil rights case, Cooper v. State of California, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint names the State of California, the City and County of San Francisco, and various law enforcement officials as defendants. The case is based on a federal question.

Edwards v. Santa Cruz Courts - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Edwards v. Santa Cruz Courts et al., was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint for Mandamus and Other relief, with a recent filing of a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

KNIGGE v. AMERAIL SYSTEMS INC et al - Labor Fair Standards Case

A civil case, KNIGGE v. AMERAIL SYSTEMS INC et al, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Sonoma County Superior Court and is based on Federal Question jurisdiction, with a Nature of Suit related to Labor: Fair Standards.

Dawydiak v. Femasys Inc. - Labor Diversity Case Filing

A new diversity labor case, Dawydiak v. Femasys Inc. et al., was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from California State Court, with Femasys Inc. as the filing party.

Mitchell v. Walmart Inc. - Civil Case

Walmart Inc. has filed a Notice of Removal in the case Mitchell v. Walmart Inc., case number 4:26-cv-01643, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case was originally filed in Contra Costa Superior Court and was removed to federal court based on diversity jurisdiction.

Navarro v. Amerigas Propane, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Navarro v. Amerigas Propane, Inc., was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from a state court action, with Amerigas Propane, Inc. as the defendant.