Search

KAPLAN v. Blackshark.ai Inc. - Notice of Removal

Blackshark.ai Inc. filed a Notice of Removal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, case number 3:26-cv-02016, on March 9, 2026. This action moves a case previously filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, to federal court.

Tejada v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al - Civil Case

A new civil case, Tejada v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims against Meta Platforms, Inc. and other related entities. The initial filing includes a complaint, certificate of interested entities, and proposed summons.

Asercion v. The Gap, Inc. - Civil Case Filing

A civil case, Asercion v. The Gap, Inc., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on March 9, 2026. The case involves a Notice of Removal from San Mateo County Superior Court, with The Gap, Inc. as the filing party.

Dufour v. Southwest Airlines Co. - Civil Rights

Southwest Airlines Co. has filed a Notice of Removal in the case Dufour v. Southwest Airlines Co., case number 3:26-cv-02009, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The filing occurred on March 9, 2026, and includes a Certificate of Interested Entities.

D. v. Uber Technologies Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, D. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al., was filed against Uber Technologies Inc. on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on diversity jurisdiction and concerns personal injury product liability.

Diamond v. The Campbell's Company - Product Liability

A new civil case, Diamond v. The Campbell's Company, was filed on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves personal injury and product liability claims. A recent filing indicates the case was transferred to this district as part of a multidistrict litigation.

Sumisaki v. SSA Commissioner - Social Security Case

Grace Sumisaki filed a civil complaint against the SSA Commissioner in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 4:26-cv-02027, was filed on March 9, 2026, with a filing fee of $405.

Nordheim v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection - Administrative Review

Odin Nordheim filed a civil complaint against U.S. Customs and Border Protection on March 9, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, Nordheim v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection, is based on a federal question and involves review or appeal of an agency decision under the Administrative Procedures Act.

Tino Cartez Sutton v. State of Tennessee - Appeal Dismissed for Late Filing

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed an appeal filed by Tino Cartez Sutton due to a late filing of the notice of appeal. The appellant failed to file within the mandatory 30-day period required by Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a).

Father's Appeal Dismissed for Failing to Comply with Briefing Rules

The Tennessee Court of Appeals dismissed a father's appeal because his brief failed to comply with appellate procedure rules. The court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the father's petition for parenting time. This decision highlights the importance of adhering to procedural rules in appeals.