Searching in State Courts · Search everything

2,453 changes

Favicon for courts.ca.gov

Jamice Fowler v. Spring Oaks Capital SPV - Appeal

Jamice Fowler has appealed a judgment issued in favor of Spring Oaks Capital SPV. This filing represents the appellant's notice of appeal, initiating the appellate review process for the original judgment. The specific grounds for the appeal are detailed within the court documents.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for courts.ca.gov

Higginson v. Kia Motors America - Case Opinion

This document is a case opinion for Higginson v. Kia Motors America. The court's decision addresses specific legal arguments presented in the case. The opinion provides a judicial interpretation of relevant laws and precedents.

Routine Enforcement Consumer Protection
Favicon for courts.ca.gov

Navellier et al. v. Putnam et al. - Civil Case

This document pertains to a civil case, Navellier et al. v. Putnam et al., identified by case number A172077. The filing indicates a new legal action has been initiated or is being processed within the court system.

Routine Enforcement Securities
Favicon for courts.ca.gov

People v. Heaps - Appellate Case Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has made available its opinion in the appellate case People v. Heaps, case number B329296. This filing makes the court's decision publicly accessible.

Routine Enforcement Criminal Justice
Favicon for courts.ca.gov

Tiburon LLC v. Tiburon Town - Case Opinion

The California Court of Appeal has made available its opinion in the case of Tiburon LLC v. Tiburon Town. This update pertains to a legal proceeding and does not introduce new regulatory requirements.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for courts.ca.gov

Fuentes v. Empire Nissan - Arbitration Agreement Enforceability

The California Supreme Court is reviewing the enforceability of arbitration agreements in consumer contracts, specifically in the case of Fuentes v. Empire Nissan. This civil appeal concerns whether certain arbitration clauses are unconscionable and therefore unenforceable under state law.

Priority review Enforcement Consumer Protection
Favicon for courts.ca.gov

Tavares v. Zipcar - Case Information

This document provides case information and links to opinions for Tavares v. Zipcar, a legal case filed in the US court system. It serves as an informational update regarding ongoing litigation.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for courts.ca.gov

Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court - Opinion Modification

The California Court of Appeal has modified its previous opinion in the case of Microsoft Corp. v. Superior Court. This modification pertains to the court's prior ruling, but specific details of the changes are not provided in the document title.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for courts.ca.gov

Disney Platform Distribution v. City of Santa Barbara Opinion

The California Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of Disney Platform Distribution v. City of Santa Barbara. This ruling addresses issues related to cable franchising agreements and municipal authority over telecommunications infrastructure.

Routine Enforcement Telecommunications
Favicon for courts.ca.gov

Brown v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles

This document details the case of Brown v. Dept. of Motor Vehicles. It appears to be a court filing related to a dispute involving the Department of Motor Vehicles. Further details on the specific nature of the case and its resolution are not provided in the summary.

Routine Enforcement Transportation

Showing 2391–2400 of 2,453 changes

1 238 239 240 241 242 246

Get alerts for ""

We'll email you when new changes match this search.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.