Searching in Federal Courts · Search everything

1,514 changes

Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Murphy et al v. Coinbase, Inc. et al - Civil Case

A civil case, Murphy et al v. Coinbase, Inc. et al, was filed on February 23, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a notice of removal from San Francisco County Superior Court, with Coinbase, Inc. and Coinbase Global, Inc. as defendants. The nature of the suit is listed as 'Other Statutory Actions' under Federal Question basis.

Priority review Enforcement Securities
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Tankoba v. Cafe Figard, Inc. - Civil Rights Jobs Case

A new civil rights case concerning employment has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, Tankoba v. Cafe Figard, Inc., was filed on February 23, 2026, and involves allegations related to civil rights in employment.

Priority review Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Central Mutual Insurance Company v. Santa Clara Swim Club - Insurance Case

Central Mutual Insurance Company has filed a new civil case against Santa Clara Swim Club, LLC, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, bearing number 5:26-cv-01574, was filed on February 23, 2026, under diversity jurisdiction with an insurance basis.

Routine Enforcement Insurance
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Ore v. U.S. Marshal Wise et al - Civil Rights

Christopher P. Ore filed a civil rights complaint against U.S. Marshal Alex, U.S. Marshal Wise, and the Attorney General of the United States. The case, filed on February 23, 2026, seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, damages, and a jury trial. An initial case management scheduling order has been issued.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Gastelum v. 82 SJ Hotel Holding LLC - Civil Rights Lawsuit

A new civil case, Gastelum v. 82 SJ Hotel Holding LLC, was filed on February 23, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case is based on Federal Question jurisdiction and concerns alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The filing fee was $405.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.cand.uscourts.gov

Gastelum v. 2105 SJ Hotel Holding LLC - ADA Lawsuit

A federal question lawsuit alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act was filed on February 23, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, Gastelum v. 2105 SJ Hotel Holding LLC, involves a complaint filed by Fernando Gastelum against the hotel holding company.

Priority review Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

French v. Elliott - Civil Rights Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's decision denying relief on a 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 complaint filed by Aaron Little French. The unpublished opinion stated no reversible error was found in the lower court's ruling.

Routine Enforcement Civil Rights
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

US v. Robert Fall - Affirmation of District Court Order

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's order in the case of US v. Robert Michael Fall. The court denied Fall's motion for appointment of counsel while granting his motion to seal medical records. This unpublished opinion does not constitute binding precedent.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

Wong v. Town of University Park - Civil Action Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a district court's dismissal of Edward Wong's civil action. The dismissal was based on failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. The court found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration
Favicon for www.ca4.uscourts.gov

Fourth Circuit Denies Mandamus Petition

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Martinez Orlandis Black. The court found that mandamus relief was not appropriate in this case, as it does not have jurisdiction to grant such relief against state officials or review final state court orders.

Routine Enforcement Judicial Administration

Showing 1281–1290 of 1,514 changes

1 127 128 129 130 131 152

Get alerts for ""

We'll email you when new changes match this search.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.