Search

GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal - Denial of Yearsley Protection Not Immediately Appealable

The Supreme Court ruled in GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal that a pretrial order denying a federal contractor 'Yearsley protection' is not immediately appealable. The Court held that the denial of this defense is not an immunity from suit, and thus does not qualify for interlocutory review under the collateral-order doctrine.

Villarreal v. Texas - Qualified Testimony Discussion Ban Affirmed

The Supreme Court affirmed a conviction in Villarreal v. Texas, holding that a qualified order prohibiting a testifying defendant from discussing their testimony during an overnight recess does not violate the Sixth Amendment. This ruling clarifies the balance between a defendant's right to counsel and the integrity of trial testimony.

KNIGGE v. AMERAIL SYSTEMS INC et al - Labor Fair Standards Case

A civil case, KNIGGE v. AMERAIL SYSTEMS INC et al, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from Sonoma County Superior Court and is based on Federal Question jurisdiction, with a Nature of Suit related to Labor: Fair Standards.

Lyubelskiy v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC - Civil Case

A civil case, Lyubelskiy v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Notice of Removal from San Francisco Superior Court, with Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC as the filing party.

H.M. v. US Bureau of Prisons - Civil Case

A new civil case, H.M. v. US Bureau of Prisons, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against the Federal Bureau of Prisons and other defendants, with a filing fee of $405.

A.G. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al - Civil Suit

The Attorney General has filed a civil suit against Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC, and Raiser-CA, LLC. The case, filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, is based on diversity jurisdiction and concerns personal injury claims.

Bakki et al v. Rubio et al - Immigration Habeas Corpus

A new case, Bakki et al v. Rubio et al, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief related to immigration actions.

Roe CL 283 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. - Personal Injury Product Liability

A new civil case, Roe CL 283 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al., was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves claims of personal injury and product liability. The filing includes a complaint and proposed summons.

Roundtree v. SSA Commissioner - Social Security Case Filing

A new civil case, Roundtree v. SSA Commissioner, was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case concerns Social Security disability benefits, and the plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

LuxCreo Inc. v. Carbon, Inc. - Patent Lawsuit

LuxCreo Inc. has filed a patent lawsuit against Carbon, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, docketed as 3:26-cv-01635, was filed on February 25, 2026, with the initial complaint and supporting exhibits submitted.