Changeflow GovPing Legislation International Trade Commission - Disposable Vap...
Routine Notice Removed Final

International Trade Commission - Disposable Vaporizer Devices Investigation Terminated

Favicon for www.federalregister.gov Federal Register Tariff RSS
Published March 13th, 2026
Detected March 13th, 2026
Email

Summary

The International Trade Commission has issued a notice terminating Investigation No. 337-TA-1410 concerning certain disposable vaporizer devices. The commission determined there was no violation of law, closing the investigation without penalties.

What changed

The International Trade Commission (ITC) has issued a final determination of no violation and terminated Investigation No. 337-TA-1410 concerning certain disposable vaporizer devices. This notice signifies the closure of the investigation without any finding of infringement or violation of the relevant statutes.

This action means that no further compliance actions or penalties will be imposed on the parties involved in this specific investigation. Regulated entities, particularly manufacturers of disposable vaporizer devices, can consider this matter resolved and should ensure their products comply with existing regulations. No immediate actions are required from compliance officers based on this termination notice.

Source document (simplified)

Legal Status This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Legal Status

Notice

You may be interested in this older document that published on 01/14/2026 with action 'Notice.' View Document

Certain Disposable Vaporizer Devices; Notice of Final Commission Determination of No Violation; Termination of Investigation

A Notice by the International Trade Commission on 03/13/2026

  • 1.

1.

  • Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency International Trade Commission Agency/Docket Number Investigation No. 337-TA-1410 Document Citation 91 FR 12444 Document Number 2026-04908 Document Type Notice Pages 12444-12446
    (3 pages) Publication Date 03/13/2026 Published Content - Document Details

  • PDF Official Content

  • Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency International Trade Commission Agency/Docket Number Investigation No. 337-TA-1410 Document Citation 91 FR 12444 Document Number 2026-04908 Document Type Notice Pages 12444-12446
    (3 pages) Publication Date 03/13/2026 Published Content - Document Details

  • Table of Contents Enhanced Content - Table of Contents This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
    headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
    This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
    has no substantive legal effect.

  • Related Documents Enhanced Content - Related Documents FederalRegister.gov uses the agency dockets published with the document to display related documents.

| Investigation No. 337-TA-1410
(6 Documents) | | | |
| --- | | | |
| Date | | Action | Title |
| | 2026-03-13 | Notice. | Certain Disposable Vaporizer Devices; Notice of Final Commission Determination of No Violation; Termination of Investigation |
| | 2026-01-14 | Notice. | Certain Disposable Vaporizer Devices; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part the Final Initial Determination and To Request Written Submissions on the Issues Under Review and Remedy, Bond, and the Public Interest |
| | 2025-11-21 | Notice. | Certain Disposable Vaporizer Devices; Second Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest |
| | 2025-09-18 | Notice. | Certain Disposable Vaporizer Devices; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest |
| | 2024-08-01 | Notice. | Certain Disposable Vaporizer Devices; Designation of Temporary Relief Proceedings as More Complicated |
| View More Docket Documents | | | |

Enhanced Content - Related Documents

  • Public Comments Enhanced Content - Public Comments This feature is not available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Public Comments
- Regulations.gov Data Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data Additional information is not currently available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

- Sharing Enhanced Content - Sharing Shorter Document URL https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-04908 Email Email this document to a friend Enhanced Content - Sharing

  • Print Enhanced Content - Print
  • Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats:

JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.

Enhanced Content - Other Formats
- Public Inspection Public Inspection This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-04908 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
03/12/2026 at 8:45 am.

It was viewed
15
times while on Public Inspection.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.

Public Inspection
Published Document: 2026-04908 (91 FR 12444) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:

  1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
  2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
  3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
  4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.
International Trade Commission
  1. [Investigation No. 337-TA-1410]

AGENCY:

U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION:

Notice.

SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission (“Commission”) has determined to reverse the violation findings of the final initial determination (“FID”) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (“ALJ”) in this investigation and find that asserted claims 4 and 12, and claim 1 on which they depend, of U.S. Patent No. 11,925,202 (“the 202 patent”) are invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. 103 (“section 103”), and thus there is no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (“section 337”). The Commission has also determined to take no position on whether the complainants satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. The Commission otherwise adopts the findings of the FID to the extent they do not conflict with the attached opinion, with some modifications to supplement its finding that claims 4 and 12 are not anticipated under 35 U.S.C. 102 (“section 102”). This investigation is hereby terminated with a finding of no violation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Carl Bretscher, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2382. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Commission instituted this investigation on July 22, 2024, based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed by R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company; R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company; RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc.; and RAI Services Company of Winston-Salem, North Carolina (collectively, “Reynolds” or “Complainant”) accusing the respondents of violating section 337 by importing into the United States, selling for importation, or selling in the United States after importation certain disposable vaporizer devices that infringe one or more of the asserted claims of the 202 patent. 89 FR 59158-60 (Jul. 22, 2024). The complaint further alleges that a domestic industry exists in the United States.

The Commission's notice of investigation names thirty-five (35) named respondents, of which eighteen (18) respondents participated in the investigation, fifteen (15) respondents were found in default, and two (2) respondents were terminated on the basis of consent orders and consent order stipulations. The eighteen (18) respondents that participated in this investigation are: Breeze Smoke, LLC of Southfield, Michigan; Dongguan (Shenzhen) Shikai Technology Co., Ltd. of Dongguan, China; Guangdong Qisitech Co., Ltd. of Dongguan City, China; Guangdong Fewo Intelligent Manufacturing Ltd. of Dongguan City, China; Guangdong Cellular Workshop Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. of Dongguan City, China; Zhuhai Qisitech Co., Ltd. of Zhuhai, China; Shenzhen Han Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Shenzhen IVPS Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Maduro Distributors d/b/a The Loon of Fridley, ( printed page 12445) Minnesota; Shenzhen Yanyang Technology Co., Ltd. of Huizhou, China; Pastel Cartel, LLC of Austin, Texas; American Vape Company, LLC of Pflugerville, Texas; Affiliated Imports, LLC of Austin, Texas; Shenzhen Kangvape Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Shenzhen Pingray Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen City, China; SV3, LLC d/b/a Mi-One Brands of Phoenix, Arizona; Price Point Distributors Inc. d/b/a Price Point NY of Farmingdale, New York; and TheSy, LLC d/b/a Element Vape of El Monte, California (collectively, “Respondents”). FID at 6-9. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (“OUII”) is also as a party. 89 FR at 59160.

The fifteen (15) respondents found in default are: Vapeonly Technology Co. Ltd. of Hong Kong; iMiracle (Shenzhen) Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; Nevera (HK) Ltd. of Hong Kong; Wonder Ladies Ltd. of British Virgin Islands; Sailing South Ltd. of British Virgin Islands; Marea Morada Ltd. of British Virgin Islands; Social Brands, LLC of Dallas, Texas; Palma Terra Ltd. of British Virgin Islands; Heaven Gifts International Ltd. of Hong Kong; Shenzhen LC Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; LCF Labs, Inc. of Ontario, California; Flumgio Technology Ltd. of Hong Kong; Flawless Vape Shop Inc. of Anaheim, California; Flawless Vape Wholesale & Distribution Inc. of Anaheim, California; and VICA Trading Inc. d/b/a Vapesourcing of Tustin, California (collectively, “Defaulting Respondents”). See Order No. 17 (Sept. 16, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Oct. 8, 2024).

The two (2) respondents that were terminated from this investigation are: Kimsun Technology (HuiZhou) Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China and Bidi Vapor, LLC of Orlando, Florida. Order No. 10 (Aug. 28, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Sept. 23, 2024); Order No. 26 (Nov. 5, 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Dec. 5, 2024).

On June 11, 2024, the same date it filed its complaint, Reynolds filed a motion for a temporary exclusion order (“TEO”). Respondents filed a joint memorandum in opposition to Reynolds's motion for a TEO on August 12, 2024. The presiding ALJ held an evidentiary hearing on September 26 and 27, and October 8, 2024. On November 19, 2024, the ALJ issued an ID denying Reynolds's motion for a TEO, which the Commission determined not to review. Order No. 28 (Nov. 19. 2024), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (Dec. 18, 2024).

On May 1, 2025, the Commission partially terminated the investigation with respect to claims 3, 8, 10, 13, 17-27, and 29-30 of the ’202 patent due to voluntary withdrawal of the claims. Order No. 44 (Apr. 7, 2025), unreviewed by Comm'n Notice (May 1, 2025).

On March 14, 2025, the presiding ALJ issued a Markman order construing the disputed claim terms. Order No. 34 (Mar. 14, 2025). The ALJ held an evidentiary hearing from April 7-11, 2025, with an additional day of testimony on domestic industry on June 11, 2025. By that time, Reynolds was asserting claims 1, 4, 9, 11, 12, and 15 of the ’202 patent for purposes of infringement, and claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, and 14-16 for purposes of domestic industry.

On August 29, 2025, the ALJ issued the present FID, finding that Respondents violated section 337 by way of infringing claims 4 and 12 of the 202 patent, and that neither claim is invalid as anticipated or obvious under 35 U.S.C. 102 or section 103, respectively. FID at 189-90. The FID found that Respondents also infringed claims 1, 11, and 15, but those claims are invalid as anticipated. Id. The FID also found that Reynolds satisfied both the technical and economic prongs of the domestic industry requirement. Id. at 98, 117, 121, 182.

On September 12, 2025, the ALJ issued a Recommended Determination on Remedy, Bonding, and Public Interest (“RD”), recommending that the Commission issue a general exclusion order (“GEO”) in the event a violation is found, or, in the alternative, a limited exclusion order covering infringing articles imported by or on behalf of each respondent found to have violated section 337 and each defaulting respondent. RD at 3, 26, 30. The ALJ also recommended that the Commission issue cease and desist orders against certain respondents and set a bond of 136% of the entered value of infringing articles imported during the period of Presidential review. Id. at 3, 40, 44. The ALJ further recommended finding that the public interest factors do not preclude issuance of a remedy. Id.

On September 15, 2025, the Commission issued a notice requesting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief, should the Commission find a violation. 90 FR 45056 (Sept. 18, 2025). The Commission issued a second notice on November 18, 2025, and extended the deadline for responses because the original deadline expired during the shutdown of the Federal Government. 90 FR 52700 (Nov. 21, 2025).

On September 15, 2025, Respondents filed a petition for review of the FID, including its construction of the claim term “smoking article” and its findings that claims 4 and 12 are infringed, literally or by equivalence, as well as its findings that claims 4 and 12 are neither anticipated nor obvious over the prior art.

On September 23, 2025, Reynolds and OUII filed their respective responses to Respondents' petition for review. Neither Reynolds nor OUII filed a petition for review of their own and have thus waived any objections they may have had to the FID's findings that claims 1, 9, 11, and 15 of the ’202 patent are invalid as anticipated, per Commission Rule 210.43(b)(4), 19 CFR 210.43(b)(4).

On January 9, 2026, the Commission determined to review the FID in part, including its findings that: (i) claims 4 and 12 are not invalid as anticipated under section 102; (ii) claims 4 and 12 are not invalid as obvious under section 103; and (iii) Reynolds satisfied the domestic industry requirement. 91 FR 1555-57 (Jan. 14, 2026). The Commission did not review, and has thus adopted, the FID's findings on claim construction, infringement, and invalidity of claims 1, 9, 11, and 15 (except to the extent that claims 4 and 12 depend on claim 1). See id. at 1556.

On January 23, 2026, Reynolds, Respondents, and OUII filed their initial submissions in response to the Commission's January 9, 2026, notice. On January 30, 2026, Reynolds, Respondents, and OUII submitted their respective replies in each other's submissions.

The Commission has also received submissions from two third parties. On December 1, 2025, non-parties NJOY, LLC, Altria Group Distribution Company, and Altria Client Service LLC (collectively, “NJOY”) submitted a response to the Commission's second request for public interest submissions. On January 23, 2026, NJOY submitted a second submission in response to the Commission's notice of partial review and request for public submissions. On the same date, the Commission received a submission from Vapor Technology Association, a U.S. trade association representing manufacturers, distributors, retailers, wholesalers, suppliers, and other vapor technology businesses in the United States.

Upon review of the FID, the parties' submissions, and the evidence of record, the Commission has determined to reverse the FID and find that claims 4 and 12, and claim 1 on which they depend, are invalid as obvious under 35 U.S.C. 103, as set forth in the attached opinion. The Commission has also determined to take no position on whether Reynolds satisfied the economic prong of the domestic ( printed page 12446) industry requirement. The Commission otherwise adopts the remaining findings of the FID, with some modifications to supplement its finding that Respondents failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that either claim 4 or claim 12 is invalid as anticipated under section 102. Accordingly, this investigation is terminated with a finding of no violation of section 337.

The Commission vote for this determination took place on March 10, 2026.

The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210).

By order of the Commission.

Issued: March 10, 2026.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2026-04908 Filed 3-12-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P

Published Document: 2026-04908 (91 FR 12444)

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Office of the Federal Register
Published
March 13th, 2026
Instrument
Notice
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Manufacturers
Geographic scope
National (US)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Consumer Protection
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Product Safety International Trade

Get Legislation alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Federal Register Tariff RSS publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.