Legal Status This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Legal Status

Proposed Rule

You may be interested in this older document that published on 03/28/2024 with action 'Final rule.' View Document

Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Facility Response Plans: Compliance Date Delay and Changes To Reflect Administration Policy

A Proposed Rule by the Environmental Protection Agency on 03/05/2026

• 1.

1.
This document has a comment period that ends in 32 days.
(04/06/2026) Submit a public comment

Thank you for taking the time to create a comment. Your input is important.

Once you have filled in the required fields below you can preview and/or submit your comment to the Environmental Protection Agency for review. All comments are considered public and will be posted online once the Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed them.

You can view alternative ways to comment or you may also comment via Regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0585-0393.

It appears that you have attempted to comment on this document before
so we've restored your progress.
Start over.
1.
2. Comment * What is your comment about? Upload File(s) Note: You can attach your comment as a file and/or attach supporting
documents to your comment. Attachment Requirements.

Email this will NOT be posted on regulations.gov

Opt to receive email confirmation of submission and tracking number? Tell us about yourself! I am... * An Individual An Organization Anonymous First Name * Last Name * City Region State Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Zip Country Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Phone Organization Type * Company Organization Federal State Local Tribal Regional Foreign U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate Organization Name * You are filing a document into an official docket. Any personal
information included in your comment text and/or uploaded
attachment(s) may be publicly viewable on the web. I read and understand the statement above.

2. Preview Comment Please review the Regulations.gov privacy notice and user notice.
3. Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency Environmental Protection Agency Agency/Docket Numbers EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0585 FRL-7881.1-01-OLEM CFR 40 CFR 118 Document Citation 91 FR 10787 Document Number 2026-04388 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 10787-10792 (6 pages) Publication Date 03/05/2026 RIN 2050-AH38 Published Content - Document Details

• PDF Official Content
  • View printed version (PDF) Official Content
• Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency Environmental Protection Agency Agency/Docket Numbers EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0585 FRL-7881.1-01-OLEM CFR 40 CFR 118 Document Citation 91 FR 10787 Document Number 2026-04388 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 10787-10792 (6 pages) Publication Date 03/05/2026 RIN 2050-AH38 Published Content - Document Details
• Document Dates Published Content - Document Dates Comments Close 04/06/2026 Dates Text Comments must be received on or before April 6, 2026. Published Content - Document Dates

• Table of Contents Enhanced Content - Table of Contents This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
  headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
  This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
  has no substantive legal effect.

  • ACTION:
  • SUMMARY:
  • DATES:
  • ADDRESSES:
  • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
  • SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
  • I. Public Participation
  • A. Written Comments
  • II. General Information
  • A. Does this action apply to me?
  • B. What action is the Agency taking?
  • C. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
  • D. What are the costs and benefits of this action?
  • III. Background
  • IV. Proposal To Delay the Compliance Date and Make Language Modifications To Align With the Administration's Climate Change and Environmental Justice Policies
  • A. Delay the Compliance Date
  • B. Modifications To Align With Administration Policies and Strengthen Community Protection
  • V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
  • A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
  • B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation
  • C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
  • D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
  • E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
  • F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
  • G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
  • H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
  • I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
  • J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
  • List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 118
  • PART 118—CLEAN WATER ACT HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES FACILITY RESPONSE PLANS
  • Footnotes Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

• Related Documents Enhanced Content - Related Documents FederalRegister.gov uses the agency dockets published with the document to display related documents.

| EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0585
(4 Documents) | | | |
| --- | | | |
| Date | | Action | Title |
| | 2026-03-05 | Proposed rule. | Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Facility Response Plans: Compliance Date Delay and Changes To Reflect Administration Policy |
| | 2024-03-28 | Final rule. | Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Facility Response Plans |
| | 2022-05-16 | Extension of comment period. | Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Worst Case Discharge Planning Regulations; Extension of Comment Period |
| | 2022-03-28 | Proposed rule. | Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Worst Case Discharge Planning Regulations |

Enhanced Content - Related Documents

• Public Comments Enhanced Content - Public Comments Comments are being accepted - Submit a public comment.

Enhanced Content - Public Comments
- Regulations.gov Data Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.

Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Worst Case Discharge Planning Regulations

Comment Due Date 04/06/2026 Docket ID EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0585 Supporting Documents Regulatory Impact Analysis: Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Worst Case Discharge Planning Regulations U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2021). Table 1.1.9. Implicit Price Deflators for Gross Domestic Product, 2020 - 1993 The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments... Integrating the Ecological and Economic Dimensions in Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service Valuation NFPA 1 Fire Code, 2018 A Review of the LD50 and Its Current Role in Hazard Communication EPA National Recommended Water Quality Criteria - Aquatic Life Criteria Table How EPA Regulates Drinking Water Contaminants Health-based Provisional Advisory Levels (PALs) for Homeland Security EPA's Total Risk Integrated Methodology TRIM.FaTE See all 177 supporting documents Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

- Sharing Enhanced Content - Sharing Shorter Document URL https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-04388 Email Email this document to a friend Enhanced Content - Sharing

• Print Enhanced Content - Print
  • Print this document Enhanced Content - Print
• Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats:

JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.

Enhanced Content - Other Formats
- Public Inspection Public Inspection This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-04388 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
03/04/2026 at 8:45 am.

It was viewed
96
times while on Public Inspection.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507. Learn more here.

Public Inspection
Published Document: 2026-04388 (91 FR 10787) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:

1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

Environmental Protection Agency

1. 40 CFR Part 118
2. [EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0585; FRL-7881.1-01-OLEM]
3. RIN 2050-AH38

ACTION:

Proposed rule.

SUMMARY:

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to delay the compliance date for Facility Response Plan (FRP) requirements as well as to make language modifications to align with the Administration's climate change and environmental justice policies in Executive Order 14148 of January 20, 2025. These requirements are for onshore non-transportation-related facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment from a CWA hazardous substance worst case discharge to navigable waters, adjoining shorelines, or the exclusive economic zone. This delay action is necessary to allow the Agency to consider implementation and compliance assistance tools that regulated parties may be able to take advantage of when complying with the new requirements. EPA notes that it cannot quantify the number, nature, and magnitude of covered discharges that may occur during the proposed rule delay period.

DATES:

Comments must be received on or before April 6, 2026.

ADDRESSES:

You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0585, by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov/ (our preferred method). Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. A plain language summary of the proposed rule is also available at this address.
• Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center, EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0585 Docket, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: EPA Docket Center, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004. The Docket Center's hours of operations are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID No. for this rulemaking. Comments received may be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the “Public Participation” heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca Broussard, Office of Land and Emergency Management, Mail Code 5104A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 564-6706; email address: broussard.rebecca@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation

A. Written Comments

Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0585 at https://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or the other methods identified in the ADDRESSES section. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from the docket. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit to EPA's docket at https://www.regulations.gov any ( printed page 10788) information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), Proprietary Business Information (PBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). Please visit https://www.epa.gov/​dockets/​commenting-epa-dockets for additional submission methods; the full EPA public comment policy; information about CBI, PBI, or multimedia submissions; and general guidance on making effective comments.

II. General Information

On March 28, 2024, EPA published a final rule requiring onshore non-transportation-related facilities to develop Facility Response Plans (FRPs) for responding to a worst case discharge of CWA hazardous substances, or a substantial threat of such a discharge, and submit them to EPA. A worst case discharge is defined as the largest foreseeable discharge in adverse weather conditions, including a discharge resulting from fire or explosion. The FRP requirements apply to onshore non-transportation-related facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment, based on their location. The date for plan preparation and submission is currently June 1, 2027.

This action proposes a three-year delay of the compliance date by which a regulated facility is required to prepare and submit their CWA hazardous substance FRP, to June 1, 2030. The proposal also includes language modifications to reflect the Administration's policies, pursuant to the January 20, 2025, Executive Order 14148 — Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions, and specifically, the rescission of Executive Order 13990 — Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis and of Executive Order 14096 — Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to Environmental Justice for All.

A. Does this action apply to me?

A list of NAICS codes at the three-digit level that could be affected by requirements established under CWA section 311(j)(5) is provided in table 1.

| NAICS | NAICS description |
| --- | --- |
| 111 | Crop Production. |
| 112 | Animal Production and Aquaculture. |
| 115 | Support Activities for Agriculture and Forestry. |
| 211 | Oil and Gas Extraction. |
| 212 | Mining (except Oil and Gas). |
| 213 | Support Activities for Mining. |
| 221 | Utilities. |
| 236 | Construction of Buildings. |
| 237 | Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction. |
| 238 | Specialty Trade Contractors. |
| 311 | Food Manufacturing. |
| 312 | Beverage and Tobacco Product Manufacturing. |
| 313 | Textile Mills. |
| 314 | Textile Product Mills. |
| 321 | Wood Product Manufacturing. |
| 322 | Paper Manufacturing. |
| 323 | Printing and Related Support Activities. |
| 324 | Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing. |
| 325 | Chemical Manufacturing. |
| 326 | Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing. |
| 327 | Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing. |
| 331 | Primary Metal Manufacturing. |
| 332 | Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing. |
| 333 | Machinery Manufacturing. |
| 334 | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing. |
| 335 | Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing. |
| 336 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing. |
| 339 | Miscellaneous Manufacturing. |
| 423 | Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods. |
| 424 | Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods. |
| 441 | Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers. |
| 444 | Building Material and Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealers. |
| 447 | Gasoline Stations. |
| 453 | Miscellaneous Store Retailers. |
| 481 | Air Transportation. |
| 486 | Rail Transportation. |
| 488 | Support Activities for Transportation. |
| 493 | Warehousing and Storage. |
| 511 | Publishing Industries (except Internet). |
| 518 | Data Processing, Hosting, and Related Services. |
| 522 | Credit Intermediation and Related Activities. |
| 531 | Real Estate. |
| 541 | Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services. |
| 561 | Administrative and Support Services. |
| 562 | Waste Management and Remediation Services. |
| 611 | Educational Services. |
| ( printed page 10789) | |
| 622 | Hospitals. |
| 624 | Social Assistance. |
| 712 | Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions. |
| 713 | Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries. |
| 811 | Repair and Maintenance. |
| 812 | Personal and Laundry Services. |
| 921 | Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support. |
| 924 | Administration of Environmental Quality Programs. |
| 926 | Administration of Economic Programs. |
| 928 | National Security and International Affairs. |
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding affected entities potentially regulated by this action. This table includes the types of entities that EPA is aware could potentially be regulated by this action. Other types of entities not included in the table could also be regulated. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

B. What action is the Agency taking?

EPA is proposing to delay the compliance date for regulated facilities to meet the FRP requirements for worst case discharges of CWA hazardous substances. The requirements target onshore non-transportation-related facilities that, because of their location, could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment by discharging into or on navigable waters, adjoining shorelines, or the exclusive economic zone.

Additionally, the Agency is proposing certain language modifications to reflect the Administration's climate change and environmental justice policies.

C. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

This proposed rule is authorized by section 311(j)(5) and 501(a) of the CWA, (33 U.S.C. 1321(j)(5), 1361(a)).

D. What are the costs and benefits of this action?

EPA has determined that the proposed delay of the compliance date and the proposed language modifications to align with the Administration's climate change and environmental justice policies would have a deregulatory impact for affected facilities, State and local entities, or the Federal government with cost savings resulting from the delayed compliance date relative to the baseline. The total annualized baseline costs of EPA's 2024 final rule are $131.46 million at 7% and $163.09 million at 3% discount rates, respectively, expressed in 2022 dollars. [1 ] To calculate the cost savings for this proposed rule, EPA estimates total costs for the CWA hazardous substances FRP program under the proposed rule, for facilities and the Agency, based on delaying the 2024 baseline costs by three years. EPA then calculates the incremental cost savings of the proposed rule as the difference between FRP program costs in the baseline and the proposed rule scenario. For each set of costs EPA calculates the present value and annualized value using 7 percent and 3 percent discount rates consistent with OMB Circular A-4 and EPA's Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analysis. Total annualized FRP program costs with the three-year delay in place are $106.98 million using a 7 percent discount rate and $146.18 million using a 3 percent discount rate, expressed in 2022 dollars for consistency with the 2024 final rule. The present value of total cost savings due to the rule is estimated to be $347.7 million using a 7 percent discount rate and $543.0 million using a 3 percent discount rate, expressed in 2022 dollars. Total annualized cost savings due to the proposed rule are $24.48 million using a 7 percent discount rate and $18.21 million using a 3 percent discount rate, expressed in 2022 dollars for consistency with the 2024 final rule. Expressed in 2024 dollars, annualized cost savings are $25.97 million and $19.33 million using those respective discount rates. EPA's 2024 final rule assessed benefits of the CWA hazardous substance FRP program qualitatively, and therefore, there is no quantifiable effect of this proposed rule on benefits. Qualitatively, the costs of this proposed rule comprise the foregone benefits associated with extending the compliance date of the 2024 rule by three years.

III. Background

The CWA section 311(j)(5)(A)(i) states, “[t]he President shall issue regulations which require an owner or operator of a tank vessel or facility . . . to prepare and submit to the President a plan for responding, to the maximum extent practicable, to a worst case discharge, and to a substantial threat of such a discharge, of oil or a hazardous substance.” The EPA Administrator was delegated authority under E.O. 12777 of October 18, 1991, Implementation of section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of October 18, 1972, as amended, and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (56 FR 54757), for onshore non-transportation related facilities under this statutory provision. The EPA Administrator also has authority under CWA section 501 to prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry out provisions of the Act.

On March 28, 2022, EPA proposed the CWA Hazardous Substance Worst Case Discharge Planning Regulations (87 FR 17890); on March 28, 2024, EPA issued final FRP requirements for worst case discharges of CWA hazardous substances (89 FR 21924). The requirements are for onshore non-transportation-related facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment by discharging a CWA hazardous substance into or on the navigable waters, adjoining shorelines, or exclusive economic zone. The date for plan submission is currently June 1, 2027.

IV. Proposal To Delay the Compliance Date and Make Language Modifications To Align With the Administration's Climate Change and Environmental Justice Policies

For all the provisions detailed in this section and in this action, the EPA intends these provisions to be severable. In the event that any individual provision or part of the rule is ( printed page 10790) invalidated, EPA intends that this would not render the entire rule invalid, and that any individual provisions that can continue to operate will be left in place. The rule contains a few discrete provisions that operate independent of each other.

A. Delay the Compliance Date

This proposed rule would delay by three years the compliance date for the CWA hazardous substance FRP requirements, to June 1, 2030. This proposed delay action would allow the Agency to consider implementation and compliance assistance tools that regulated parties may be able to take advantage of when complying with the new requirements. Specifically, the Agency proposes to delay the compliance dates in 40 CFR 118.4 (a) for onshore non-transportation related facilities (hereafter, covered facilities or facility) as follows:

• Covered facilities meeting the applicable criteria in 40 CFR 118.3 (a) and (b) but not (c) that are in operation on March 30, 2030, must submit the Substantial Harm Certification Form by June 1, 2030, while covered facilities meeting the applicable criteria in 40 CFR 118.3 (a) and (b) after March 30, 2030, have 60 days to submit their form.
• Initially regulated covered facilities (covered facilities in operation on November 30, 2029, and that meet the criteria in 40 CFR 118.3 or are notified by a Regional Administrator (RA) as in § 118.5) shall prepare and submit an FRP by June 1, 2030.
• Newly regulated covered facilities (covered facilities that meet the criteria in 40 CFR 118.3 or are notified by an RA as in § 118.5 after November 30, 2029) shall prepare and submit an FRP within six months of meeting the criteria.
• Newly constructed covered facilities (covered facilities starting operations after June 1, 2030) shall prepare and submit an FRP and Substantial Harm Certification Form prior to the start of operations and including a 60-day start up period adjustment phase.
• Covered facilities regulated as a result of a planned event or change shall prepare and submit an FRP and Substantial Harm Certification Form prior to the start of operations and including a 60-day start up period adjustment phase, but no sooner than June 1, 2030.
• Covered facilities regulated as a result of an unplanned event or change shall prepare and submit an FRP and Substantial Harm Certification Form within six months of the unplanned event or change, but no sooner than June 1, 2030. EPA recognized in the 2024 final rule the complexity of implementing this new program. For example, there are many variables to consider in determining appropriate endpoints for all CWA hazardous substances present in a facility above the threshold. CWA hazardous substances and mixtures can be present onsite in myriad types of containers and configurations. Modeling worst case discharge scenarios and making substantial harm calculations will be needed to determine not only applicability but also to inform the development of the FRPs. In the final 2024 rule, EPA also signaled its intent to provide tools and compliance assistance to help the regulated community comply with these new requirements. While EPA considered this need when establishing the compliance date in the final rule, the proposed delay in this action is necessary to fully assess and consider the range of compliance assistance tools that may be needed to best support implementation of the new requirements. The Agency proposal to extend the compliance date by three years is based on timeframe expectations for the Agency to consider implementation and compliance assistance tools and approaches that would best support the regulated community. Facility owners and operators are also expected to benefit from added time to consider any new implementation and compliance assistance tools the Agency may offer. Ultimately, the Agency expects the proposed delay in the compliance date to both promote compliance and ensure well-developed FRPs.

The Agency is soliciting comments on the proposed compliance date delay, and specifically, on whether compliance with the current rule may take longer than the two years now allowed by the current date of June 1, 2027. If so, comments should include supporting rationale for why compliance would take longer than two years, referencing for example expected activities needed for regulated facilities to comply with the new requirements. Additionally, EPA seeks comment on what activities industry has already undertaken to implement the 2024 rule. The Agency is also seeking comments on whether the proposed delay timeframe is reasonable and whether a longer or shorter timeframe may be more appropriate and/or feasible. Comments should include a supporting rationale and supporting data, if any, for the Agency to consider.

B. Modifications To Align With Administration Policies and Strengthen Community Protection

Revisions to 40 CFR part 118 are necessary to reflect the Administration's policies, pursuant to the January 20, 2025 Executive Order (E.O.) 14148— Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions. E.O. 14148 specifically orders the rescission of E.O. 13990 — Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis and of E.O. 14096 — Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to Environmental Justice for All. Thus, the Agency is proposing modified language that removes references to climate change and environmental justice from the CWA hazardous substance FRP requirements.

An independent reason for this proposed action is that, upon reconsideration, EPA is concerned that undue focus on particular communities rather than on the risks posed to the community by any CWA hazardous substance release could lead to improper planning. Indeed, comprehensive substantial harm criteria should protect all communities. Similarly, disproportionate focus on climate-related hazards may result in uneven applicability determinations, which could skew planning away from a risk-based approach. This unintended consequence could lead to planning based upon highly unlikely events, rather than more common scenarios.

In addition, in 40 CFR 118.5, Regional Administrators (RA) may determine that a facility could cause substantial harm to the environment based on a variety of potential impacts or effects, negating the need for specific language for specific types of populations. The criteria in 40 CFR 118.3 are designed to capture the bulk of those facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment. However, because of the size and diversity of the types of facilities within the regulated community, EPA believes that there are facilities that will not meet the criteria in § 118.3, but may, due to facility-specific or location-specific circumstances, pose sufficient risk to the environment to be designated as being able to cause substantial harm to the environment. Accordingly, EPA has included the ability of the RA to make a case-by-case determination. The Agency recognizes that RAs possess unique knowledge of Region-specific considerations, and it is consistent with EPA's responsibilities under E.O. 12777 to designate facilities on a case-by-case basis that could reasonably be expected ( printed page 10791) to cause substantial harm to the environment.

Specifically, the Agency proposes modifications as follows:

• Remove the term “climate change” and the associated examples from the definition of “adverse weather” under 40 CFR 118.2.
• Remove reference to “climate change” from the passive mitigation provision under 40 CFR 118.5(b)(7).
• Remove “Potential to adversely impact communities with environmental justice concerns” provision under 40 CFR 118.5(b)(8), and amended to read “potentially exposed or susceptible populations.”
• Remove reference to “climate change” in adverse weather provision under 40 CFR 118.5(b)(9).
• Remove “impacts to communities with environmental justice concerns” from the hazard evaluation provision under 118.11(b)(3)(i).
• Remove “impacts of climate change” and associated examples from the hazard evaluation provision under 118.11(b)(3)(i) and replace with “in adverse weather conditions.” E.O. 14148 section 2, Revocation of Orders and Actions, specifically lists for recission both E.O. 13990 (Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis) and E.O. 14096 (Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to Environmental Justice for All). E.O. 14148 section 3, Implementation, specifically directs the heads of each agency to take immediate action to effectuate the revocations described in section 2 of the order and end federal implementation of those mandates. These actions include the “review (of) all Federal Government actions taken pursuant to the orders, memoranda, and proclamations listed in section 2 of this order and take necessary steps to rescind, replace, or amend such actions as appropriate.” The modified language EPA is proposing is consistent with E.O. 14148. The Agency seeks comment on these proposed modifications including on any significant reliance interests that may be implicated. Any alternative language, examples, or approaches presented should include a supporting rationale and supporting data, if any, for the Agency to consider.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Additional information about these statutes and executive orders can be found at https://www.epa.gov/​laws-regulations/​laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

This action is a significant regulatory action that was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review. Any changes made in response to OMB recommendations have been documented in the docket. The EPA prepared an economic analysis of the potential costs and benefits associated with this action. This analysis is available in the docket.

B. Executive Order 14192: Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation

This action is expected to be an Executive Order 14192 deregulatory action. Details on the estimated cost savings of this proposed rule can be found in EPA's analysis of the potential costs and benefits associated with this action.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

This action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA. This proposed rule would only delay the compliance date of the Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Facility Response Plan Regulation finalized on March 28, 2024 (see 89 FR 21924) and remove some administrative items; it does not propose any new information collection activities.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In making this determination, the EPA concludes that the impact of concern for this rule is any significant adverse economic impact on small entities and that the agency is certifying that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because the rule has no net regulatory burden on the small entities subject to the rule. The proposed delay of the compliance date for the Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Facility Response Plan Regulation finalized on March 24, 2024 would not impose a regulatory burden for small entities (see 89 FR 21924). This proposed rule would not impose a regulatory burden for small entities because it only proposes to delay the compliance date of the Clean Water Act Hazardous Substance Facility Response Plan Regulation finalized on March 24, 2024 (see 89 FR 21924). We have therefore concluded that this action will have no net regulatory burden for all directly regulated small entities.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

This action does not contain any unfunded mandates as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or Tribal governments or the private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

This action does not have Tribal implications as specified in Executive Order 13175. This proposed rule would only delay the compliance date of the CWA Hazardous Substance Facility Response Plan regulation finalized on March 24, 2024 (see 89 FR 21924) and does not propose any new regulatory requirements. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks

EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of “covered regulatory action” in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. Therefore, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or safety risk. Since this action does not concern human health, EPA's Policy on Children's Health also does not apply.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use

This action is not a “significant energy action” because it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution or use of energy. The proposed rule will not cause reductions in the supply or production of oil, fuel, coal, or electricity; nor will it result in increased energy prices, increased cost of energy distribution, or an increased dependence on foreign supplies of energy. ( printed page 10792)

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 118

• Environmental protection
• Hazardous substances
• Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
• Water pollution control Lee Zeldin,

Administrator.

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental Protection Agency proposes to amend 40 CFR part 118 as follows:

PART 118—CLEAN WATER ACT HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES FACILITY RESPONSE PLANS

1. Revise the authority citation for part 118 to read as follows:

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; Executive Order 11735, superseded by Executive Order 12777, 56 FR 54757; and Executive Order 14148, 90 FR 8237.

1. Amend § 118.2 by revising the definition “adverse weather” to read as follows:

§ 118.2 Definitions. * * * * * Adverse weather means weather conditions that make it difficult for response equipment and personnel to clean up or respond to discharged CWA hazardous substances, and that must be considered when identifying response systems and equipment in a response plan for the applicable operating environment.

• * * * * 3. Amend § 118.4 by revising paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) to read as follows:

§ 118.4 General requirements. (a) * * *

(1) Initially regulated facilities. The owner or operator of a non-transportation related onshore facility in operation on November 30, 2029, that satisfies the criteria in § 118.3 shall prepare and submit a facility response plan that satisfies the requirements of this section and appendix A: Substantial Harm Certification Form to the Regional Administrator by June 1, 2030.

(2) Newly regulated facilities. The owner or operator of a non-transportation related onshore facility that did not satisfy the criteria in § 118.3 on November 30, 2029, but satisfies the criteria in § 118.3 after November 30, 2029 or that is notified by the Regional Administrator pursuant to § 118.5 shall prepare and submit a facility response plan that satisfies the requirements of this section and appendix A: Substantial Harm Certification Form to the Regional Administrator within six months of meeting the criteria or notification.

(3) Newly constructed facilities. For a newly constructed non-transportation related onshore facility that commences operation after June 1, 2030, and is required to prepare and submit a facility response plan based on the criteria in § 118.3, the owner or operator shall submit the facility response plan and appendix A: Substantial Harm Certification Form to the Regional Administrator prior to the start of operations. Adjustments to the facility response plan to reflect changes that occur during the start-up phase of operations must be submitted to the Regional Administrator after an operational trial period of 60 days.

(4) Facilities regulated as a result of a planned event or change. For a non-transportation related onshore facility required to prepare and submit a facility response plan after June 1, 2030, as a result of a planned change in design, construction, operation, or maintenance so that the non-transportation related onshore facility now meets the criteria in § 118.3 of this part, the owner or operator shall submit the facility response plan and appendix A: Substantial Harm Certification Form to the Regional Administrator before the portion of the non-transportation related onshore facility undergoing the planned change commences operations. Adjustments to the facility response plan to reflect changes that occur during the start-up phase of operations must be submitted to the Regional Administrator after an operational trial period of 60 days.

(5) Facilities regulated as a result of an unplanned event or change. For a non-transportation related onshore facility required to prepare and submit a facility response plan after June 1, 2030, as a result of an unplanned event or change in facility characteristics that renders the non-transportation related onshore facility subject to the criteria in § 118.3, the owner or operator shall submit the facility response plan and appendix A: Substantial Harm Certification Form to the Regional Administrator within six months of the unplanned event or change.

• * * * * 4. Amend § 118.5 by:

a. Revising paragraphs (b)(7) through (10); and

b. Removing paragraphs (b)(11) and (12).

The revision reads as follows:

§ 118.5 Regional Administrator determination of substantial harm and significant and significant and substantial harm. * * * * * (b) * * *

(7) Lack of passive mitigation measures or systems;

(8) Reportable discharge history; or

(9) Other site-specific characteristics and environmental factors that the Regional Administrator determines to be relevant to recovery, shoreline protection, and cleanup; or

(10) Density of facilities with CWA hazardous substances onsite in the immediate area.

• * * * * 5. Amend § 118.11 by revising paragraph (b)(3)(i) to read as follows:

§ 118.11 Facility response plan requirements. * * * * * (b) * * *

(3) * * *

(i) Chemical-specific information, including the response considerations, health hazards, fire hazards, chemical reactivity, hazard classifications, and physical and chemical properties; and potential effects of a CWA hazardous substance worst case discharge as per 118.10 in adverse weather conditions. Illustrative diagrams of the hazard evaluation should be included.

---

Footnotes

1.

                     To achieve consistency with the infinite time horizon requirement set forth in [Executive Order 14192](https://www.federalregister.gov/executive-order/14192), EPA estimated baseline compliance costs through the year 2100, which EPA believes is a sufficient proxy of this concept, capturing the long-term, steady-state effects of the 2024 final rule. The same time horizon through the year 2100 was also used for calculating programs costs under the proposed delay.

Back to Citation [FR Doc. 2026-04388 Filed 3-4-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Published Document: 2026-04388 (91 FR 10787)