EPA Proposes Indiana VOC RACT Alternative Control Rule
Summary
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed a rule to approve an alternative control rule for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) in Indiana. This proposed rule is open for public comment until March 30, 2026.
What changed
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published a proposed rule to approve Indiana's alternative control rule for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT). This action, identified by docket number EPA-R05-OAR-2025-0092, pertains to Indiana's State Implementation Plan (SIP) and aims to provide an alternative compliance pathway for certain facilities regarding VOC emissions.
Regulated entities in Indiana, particularly those in the energy sector or other industries subject to VOC RACT requirements, should review the proposed rule. Public comments are due by March 30, 2026. Failure to comply with the final approved SIP requirements could result in enforcement actions by the EPA.
What to do next
- Review the proposed EPA rule regarding Indiana's VOC RACT alternative control.
- Submit public comments by March 30, 2026, if applicable.
- Prepare for potential compliance adjustments based on the final approved rule.
Source document (simplified)
Legal Status This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Legal Status
Proposed Rule
Air Plan Approval; Indiana; Keystone VOC RACT Alternative Control
A Proposed Rule by the Environmental Protection Agency on 02/27/2026
- 1.
1.
This document has a comment period that ends in 31 days.
(03/30/2026) Submit a public comment
Thank you for taking the time to create a comment. Your input is important.
Once you have filled in the required fields below you can preview and/or submit your comment to the Environmental Protection Agency for review. All comments are considered public and will be posted online once the Environmental Protection Agency has reviewed them.
You can view alternative ways to comment or you may also comment via Regulations.gov at https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/EPA-R05-OAR-2025-0092-0001.
It appears that you have attempted to comment on this document before
so we've restored your progress.
Start over.
1.
2. Comment * What is your comment about? Upload File(s) Note: You can attach your comment as a file and/or attach supporting
documents to your comment. Attachment Requirements.
Email this will NOT be posted on regulations.gov
Opt to receive email confirmation of submission and tracking number? Tell us about yourself! I am... * An Individual An Organization Anonymous First Name * Last Name * City Region State Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Zip Country Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Phone Organization Type * Company Organization Federal State Local Tribal Regional Foreign U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate Organization Name * You are filing a document into an official docket. Any personal
information included in your comment text and/or uploaded
attachment(s) may be publicly viewable on the web. I read and understand the statement above.
- Preview Comment Please review the Regulations.gov privacy notice and user notice.
- Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency Environmental Protection Agency Agency/Docket Numbers EPA-R05-OAR-2025-0092 FRL-13195-01-R5 CFR 40 CFR 52 Document Citation 91 FR 9798 Document Number 2026-03933 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 9798-9800 (3 pages) Publication Date 02/27/2026 Published Content - Document Details
- PDF Official Content
- View printed version (PDF) Official Content
- Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency Environmental Protection Agency Agency/Docket Numbers EPA-R05-OAR-2025-0092 FRL-13195-01-R5 CFR 40 CFR 52 Document Citation 91 FR 9798 Document Number 2026-03933 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 9798-9800 (3 pages) Publication Date 02/27/2026 Published Content - Document Details
- Document Dates Published Content - Document Dates Comments Close 03/30/2026 Dates Text Comments must be received on or before March 30, 2026. Published Content - Document Dates
Table of Contents Enhanced Content - Table of Contents This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.- AGENCY:
- ACTION:
- SUMMARY:
- DATES:
- ADDRESSES:
- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
- I. What is EPA proposing to approve?
- II. What are the changes from the current rule?
- III. What is the EPA's analysis of the supporting materials?
- IV. What action is the EPA taking?
- V. Incorporation by Reference
- VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
- List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
Public Comments Enhanced Content - Public Comments Comments are being accepted - Submit a public comment.
Enhanced Content - Public Comments
- Regulations.gov Data Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data
FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.
Indiana Site Specific VOC Control for Keystone dba Saturn
Comment Due Date 03/30/2026 Docket ID EPA-R05-OAR-2025-0092 Supporting Documents 2025-0092INKeystoneSaturn03-03-2025submittal Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data
- Sharing Enhanced Content - Sharing Shorter Document URL https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-03933 Email Email this document to a friend Enhanced Content - Sharing
- Print Enhanced Content - Print
- Print this document Enhanced Content - Print
- Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats:
JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
- Public Inspection Public Inspection This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-03933 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
02/26/2026 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
13
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507. Learn more here.
Public Inspection
Published Document: 2026-03933 (91 FR 9798) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:
- the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
- the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
- the agency docket number / agency internal file number
- the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.
Environmental Protection Agency
- 40 CFR Part 52
- [EPA-R05-OAR-2025-0092; FRL-13195-01-R5]
AGENCY:
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
SUMMARY:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the volatile organic compound (VOC) requirements for Keystone Automotive Industries dba Saturn Wheel (Keystone) of Huntington County, Indiana. Keystone owns and operates an aluminum alloy wheel refurbishing and distribution facility at which it performs cold cleaner degreasing operations and is subject to the VOC rules under article 8 of the Indiana Administrative Code (IAC). On February 26, 2025, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted a Commissioner's Order containing the revised requirements and requested that the EPA approve it as an amendment to the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP). IDEM is seeking the EPA approval of an equivalent control device and site specific Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for Keystone's degreasing operations, as provided in IAC article 8.
DATES:
Comments must be received on or before March 30, 2026.
ADDRESSES:
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-2025-0092 at https://www.regulations.gov or via email to langman.michael@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from the docket. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit to the EPA's docket at https://www.regulations.gov any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), Proprietary Business Information (PBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or ( printed page 9799) other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI, PBI, or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Sheffer, Air and Radiation Division (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-1027, sheffer.melissa@epa.gov. The EPA Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever “we,” “us,” or “our” is used, we mean the EPA.
I. What is EPA proposing to approve?
The EPA is proposing to approve a revision to Indiana's VOC SIP for Keystone. The company has requested that it be permitted to use an oil cover as an equivalent control device for its cold cleaner degreaser, as provided in 326 IAC 8-1-5 and 326 IAC 8-3-2. The oil cover, Aquastrip Fume Seal, is a layer of mineral oil at least one-inch thick floating over the cleaning solvent in a dip tank. The solvent is a mixture of two water miscible compounds, n-Methyl Pyrrolidone (NMP) and monoethanolamine (MEA). The oil cover controls VOC emissions from the dip tank by reducing solvent evaporation.
II. What are the changes from the current rule?
Indiana's cold cleaner degreaser control requirements are contained in 326 IAC 8-3-2. Under 326 IAC 8-3-2(b)(1), degreasers with solvent that is heated to a temperature of greater than forty-eight and nine-tenths (48.9) degrees Celsius, or 120 degrees Fahrenheit, are required to control VOC emissions using one of the following control devices: a freeboard ratio of 0.75 or greater; a water cover over the solvent when the solvent used is insoluble in, and heavier than, water; a refrigerated chiller; carbon adsorption; or VOC emission control equipment operated in accordance with 326 IAC 8-3-8(b)(3). Per 326 IAC 8-1-5(a), “[a]n owner or operator of a source may submit a petition . . . requesting a site-specific Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) plan as an alternative to the requirements in 326 IAC 8.” In accordance with 326 IAC 8-1-5(a)(6), the petition must include, among other things, a demonstration that the alternative control program constitutes RACT for the petitioned facility, and address the factors listed in 326 IAC 8-1-5(a)(6). Such alternative systems, however, must be submitted to and approved by the EPA as a SIP revision as required by 326 IAC 8-1-5(c).
III. What is the EPA's analysis of the supporting materials?
IDEM supplied the EPA with technical information on the solvents used by Keystone and the requested oil cover. IDEM also provided information on why a water cover would not work with the solvents used and why the freeboard ratio of the tank cannot practically be increased to the level required by 326 IAC 8-3-2.
The solvents Keystone uses, NMP and MEA, are miscible in water, and attempts to use a water cover would fail to reduce VOC emissions. The water would blend with the cleaning solvents and not provide any barrier against solvent evaporation. To meet the freeboard ratio requirement of 0.75, Keystone would need to raise the freeboard height on its dip tank to 108 inches (9 feet). This would require that the building be altered to accommodate the dip tank's increased height. The cost of raising the roof or lowering the floor makes this option cost prohibitive. IDEM also addressed why the use of a refrigerated condenser and carbon adsorption system, listed as options in 326 IAC 8-3-2(b), would not be feasible for Keystone due to the capital expenditures required for the installation, operation, and modification to the building, as well as increased worker hazards and environmental impacts from either control system.
In its ”Guide to Cleaner Technologies: Cleaning and Degreasing Process Changes” (EPA/625/R-93/017), the EPA suggests the use of an oil cover for operations using heated NMP. Keystone will use a heated NMP and MEA solvent blend in its operation. The supplied technical information shows that NMP and MEA have similar vapor densities. The oil cover, a layer of mineral oil at least one inch thick, provides a physical barrier between the cleaning solvents and the atmosphere. Thus, it is reasonable to expect an oil cover will provide an equivalent control technique for VOC emissions from an NMP and MEA solvent blend.
This request constitutes a petition for a site-specific RACT plan under 326 IAC 8-1-5. Consequently, Keystone was required to demonstrate to IDEM that the oil cover constitutes RACT for the subject facility, as well as address the other factors specified in 326 IAC 8-1-5(a).
IDEM provided a demonstration of compliance with Clean Air Act (CAA) section 110(l), 42 U.S.C. 7410(l), which prohibits SIP revisions from interfering with attaining air quality standards and reasonable further progress requirements. IDEM's 110(l) demonstration describes how the oil cover layer will remain on top of the degreasing solvent and control emissions of VOCs by reducing solvent evaporation, which also reduces the heat required for operations as it acts similar to an insulator. The oil cover is expected to provide equivalent control of VOC emissions compared to the use of controls required by 326 IAC 8-3-2 and therefore has no adverse impact on air quality. The EPA concurs with the 110(l) demonstration that this action will not interfere with air quality standards and reasonable further progress requirements.
IV. What action is the EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to VOC emissions regulations for the Keystone aluminum alloy wheel refurbishing and distribution facility in Huntington County, Indiana. More specifically, the EPA proposes to approve Commissioner's Order 2025-Air-01 into the Indiana SIP. The revision provides for the use of an oil cover as an equivalent VOC emission control system under 326 IAC 8-1-5 and 326 IAC 8-3-2 for its cold cleaner degreaser.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rulemaking, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference Indiana Commissioner's Order 2025-Air-01, signed February 19, 2025, discussed in section IV of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). ( printed page 9800) Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
- Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
- Is not subject to Executive Order 14192 (90 FR 9065, February 6, 2025) because SIP actions are exempt from review under Executive Order 12866;
- Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
- Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
- Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
- Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
- Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it approves a State program;
- Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
- Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA. In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rulemaking does not have Tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
- Environmental protection
- Air pollution control
- Incorporation by reference
- Intergovernmental relations
- Ozone
- Volatile organic compounds Dated: February 17, 2026.
Anne Vogel,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2026-03933 Filed 2-26-26; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Published Document: 2026-03933 (91 FR 9798)
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Legislation alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when EPA Rules & Proposed Rules publishes new changes.