Legal Status This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Legal Status

Rule

Withdrawal of 2023 Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status

A Rule by the National Labor Relations Board on 02/27/2026

• 1.

1.

• Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency National Labor Relations Board CFR 29 CFR 103 Document Citation 91 FR 9707 Document Number 2026-03955 Document Type Rule Pages 9707-9709
  (3 pages) Publication Date 02/27/2026 RIN 3142-AA21 Published Content - Document Details

• PDF Official Content

  • View printed version (PDF) Official Content

• Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency National Labor Relations Board CFR 29 CFR 103 Document Citation 91 FR 9707 Document Number 2026-03955 Document Type Rule Pages 9707-9709
  (3 pages) Publication Date 02/27/2026 RIN 3142-AA21 Published Content - Document Details

• Document Dates Published Content - Document Dates Effective Date 2026-02-27 Dates Text This rule is effective February 27, 2026. Published Content - Document Dates

• Table of Contents Enhanced Content - Table of Contents This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
  headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
  This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
  has no substantive legal effect.

  • AGENCY:
  • ACTION:
  • SUMMARY:
  • DATES:
  • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
  • SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
  • Procedural and Other Matters
  • Final Rule
  • List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 103
  • PART 103—OTHER RULES
  • Footnotes Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

• Public Comments Enhanced Content - Public Comments This feature is not available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Public Comments
- Regulations.gov Data Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data Additional information is not currently available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

- Sharing Enhanced Content - Sharing Shorter Document URL https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-03955 Email Email this document to a friend Enhanced Content - Sharing

• Print Enhanced Content - Print
  • Print this document Enhanced Content - Print
• Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats:

JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.

Enhanced Content - Other Formats
- Public Inspection Public Inspection This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-03955 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
02/26/2026 at 8:45 am.

It was viewed
73
times while on Public Inspection.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507. Learn more here.

Public Inspection
Published Document: 2026-03955 (91 FR 9707) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:

1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

National Labor Relations Board

1. 29 CFR Part 103
2. RIN 3142-AA21

AGENCY:

National Labor Relations Board.

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

On October 27, 2023, the Board published a final rule (2023 Rule) that rescinded and replaced a prior rule regarding the standard for determining joint employer status under the National Labor Relations Act. On March 8, 2024, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an order vacating the 2023 Rule. The Board is therefore revising its rules and regulations to replace the vacated regulatory text with the previous version of its rules that remain in effect due to the vacatur.

DATES:

This rule is effective February 27, 2026.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roxanne L. Rothschild, Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, 1015 Half St. SE, Washington, DC 20570-0001, (202) 273-1940 (this is not a toll-free number) or 1-844-762-NLRB (6572) (this is a toll-free number). Hearing impaired callers who wish to speak to an NLRB representative should contact T-Mobile Relay Conference Captioning by visiting its website at https://www.tmobileaccess.com/​federal, and submitting a form asking its Communications Assistant to call our toll free number at 1-844-762-NLRB (6572).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On October 27, 2023, the National Labor Relations Board published a final rule intended to rescind and replace a 2020 rule governing joint employer status under the National Labor Relations Act. (88 FR 73946, Oct. 27, 2023). The 2023 Rule, titled “Standard for Determining Joint Employer Status,” established a new standard for determining whether two employers, as defined in the Act, are joint employers of particular employees within the meaning of the Act.

On November 19, 2023, a challenge to the 2023 Rule was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Chamber of Commerce v. NLRB, No. 6:23-CV-00553 (E.D. Tex.). On March 8, 2024, the district court vacated the rule. 723 F.Supp. 3d 498, 519 (E.D. Tex. 2024). As the 2023 Rule has never taken effect, the prior rule titled “Joint Employer Status Under the National Labor Relations Act,” which was promulgated on February 26, 2020 (2020 Rule), remains the operative rule for determining joint employer status. 85 FR 11184 (Feb. 26, 2020), codified at 29 CFR 103.40. In accordance with the district court's order, the Board hereby revises 29 CFR subpart D to replace the text of the vacated 2023 Rule with the text of the 2020 Rule, which remains in effect. [1 ]

Procedural and Other Matters

Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act provides that when an agency for good cause finds that notice and public comment procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. [2 ] The Board has determined that there is good cause for making today's amendment to the 2023 Rule final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment. Because of the Court order vacating the 2023 Rule, the Board's action is ministerial in nature. Accordingly, the Board for good cause finds that a notice and comment period is unnecessary. [3 ]

The Administrative Procedure Act also generally requires that an agency publish an adopted rule in the Federal Register 30 days before it becomes effective. [4 ] This requirement, however, does not apply if the agency finds good cause for making this action to amend the 2023 Rule effective sooner. For the reasons discussed above, the Board finds that there is good cause to make repeal and replacement of the rule effective immediately.

The Board considers the costs and benefits of its rules and regulations. As discussed above, the 2023 Rule was vacated by the district court and the ( printed page 9708) action the Board takes today merely implements the Court's decision. Our action is ministerial and therefore will have no separate economic effect.

Finally, the Congressional Review Act [5 ] generally provides that before certain actions make take effect, the agency promulgating the action must submit a report, which includes a copy of the action, to each House of Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. Because this action only implements the Court vacatur, and the agency has made a good cause finding that notice and comment is unnecessary, it is not subject to the Congressional Review Act.

Final Rule

This rule is published as a final rule.

List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 103

• Jurisdictional standards
• Election procedures
• Appropriate bargaining units
• Joint employers
• Remedial orders For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the National Labor Relations Board amends 29 CFR part 103 as follows:

PART 103—OTHER RULES

1. The authority citation for part 103 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 29 U.S.C. 156, in accordance with the procedure set forth in 5 U.S.C. 553.

1. Revise § 103.40, to read as follows:

§ 103.40 Joint employers. (a) An employer, as defined by section 2(2) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act), may be considered a joint employer of a separate employer's employees only if the two employers share or codetermine the employees' essential terms and conditions of employment. To establish that an entity shares or codetermines the essential terms and conditions of another employer's employees, the entity must possess and exercise such substantial direct and immediate control over one or more essential terms or conditions of their employment as would warrant finding that the entity meaningfully affects matters relating to the employment relationship with those employees. Evidence of the entity's indirect control over essential terms and conditions of employment of another employer's employees, the entity's contractually reserved but never exercised authority over the essential terms and conditions of employment of another employer's employees, or the entity's control over mandatory subjects of bargaining other than the essential terms and conditions of employment is probative of joint-employer status, but only to the extent it supplements and reinforces evidence of the entity's possession or exercise of direct and immediate control over a particular essential term and condition of employment. Joint-employer status must be determined on the totality of the relevant facts in each particular employment setting. The party asserting that an entity is a joint employer has the burden of proof.

(b) Essential terms and conditions of employment means wages, benefits, hours of work, hiring, discharge, discipline, supervision, and direction.

(c) Direct and immediate control means each respective essential employment term or condition in paragraphs (c)(1) through (8) of this section:

(1) Wages. An entity exercises direct and immediate control over wages if it actually determines the wage rates, salary or other rate of pay that is paid to another employer's individual employees or job classifications. An entity does not exercise direct and immediate control over wages by entering into a cost-plus contract (with or without a maximum reimbursable wage rate).

(2) Benefits. An entity exercises direct and immediate control over benefits if it actually determines the fringe benefits to be provided or offered to another employer's employees. This would include selecting the benefit plans (such as health insurance plans and pension plans) and/or level of benefits provided to another employer's employees. An entity does not exercise direct and immediate control over benefits by permitting another employer, under an arm's-length contract, to participate in its benefit plans.

(3) Hours of work. An entity exercises direct and immediate control over hours of work if it actually determines work schedules or the work hours, including overtime, of another employer's employees. An entity does not exercise direct and immediate control over hours of work by establishing an enterprise's operating hours or when it needs the services provided by another employer.

(4) Hiring. An entity exercises direct and immediate control over hiring if it actually determines which particular employees will be hired and which employees will not. An entity does not exercise direct and immediate control over hiring by requesting changes in staffing levels to accomplish tasks or by setting minimal hiring standards such as those required by government regulation.

(5) Discharge. An entity exercises direct and immediate control over discharge if it actually decides to terminate the employment of another employer's employee. An entity does not exercise direct and immediate control over discharge by bringing misconduct or poor performance to the attention of another employer that makes the actual discharge decision, by expressing a negative opinion of another employer's employee, by refusing to allow another employer's employee to continue performing work under a contract, or by setting minimal standards of performance or conduct, such as those required by government regulation.

(6) Discipline. An entity exercises direct and immediate control over discipline if it actually decides to suspend or otherwise discipline another employer's employee. An entity does not exercise direct and immediate control over discipline by bringing misconduct or poor performance to the attention of another employer that makes the actual disciplinary decision, by expressing a negative opinion of another employer's employee, or by refusing to allow another employer's employee to access its premises or perform work under a contract.

(7) Supervision. An entity exercises direct and immediate control over supervision by actually instructing another employer's employees how to perform their work or by actually issuing employee performance appraisals. An entity does not exercise direct and immediate control over supervision when its instructions are limited and routine and consist primarily of telling another employer's employees what work to perform, or where and when to perform the work, but not how to perform it.

(8) Direction. An entity exercises direct and immediate control over direction by assigning particular employees their individual work schedules, positions, and tasks. An entity does not exercise direct and immediate control over direction by setting schedules for completion of a project or by describing the work to be accomplished on a project.

(d) Substantial direct and immediate control means direct and immediate control that has a regular or continuous consequential effect on an essential term or condition of employment of another employer's employees. Such control is not “substantial” if only exercised on a sporadic, isolated, or de minimis basis.

(e) Indirect control means indirect control over essential terms and conditions of employment of another employer's employees but not control or ( printed page 9709) influence over setting the objectives, basic ground rules, or expectations for another entity's performance under a contract.

(f) Contractually reserved authority over essential terms and conditions of employment means the authority that an entity reserves to itself, under the terms of a contract with another employer, over the essential terms and conditions of employment of that other employer's employees, but that has never been exercised.

Dated: February 25, 2026.

Roxanne L. Rothschild,

Executive Secretary.

Footnotes

1.

                     In accordance with the district court's vacatur of the 2023 Rule, Member Prouty joins in replacing the 2023 Rule with the 2020 Rule. However, he notes that was not a member of the Board when the 2020 Rule was promulgated and, for the reasons set forth in the preamble to the 2023 Rule, he does not believe that the 2020 Rule sets forth the proper standard for determining when an entity is a joint employer.

Back to Citation 2. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B).

Back to Citation 3.

                     This finding also satisfies the requirements of [5 U.S.C. 808(2)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/5/808) (if a Federal agency finds that notice and public comment are “impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest,” a rule “shall take effect at such time as the Federal agency promulgating the rule determines”), allowing the withdrawal to become effective notwithstanding the requirement of [5 U.S.C. 801](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/5/801). No analysis is required under the Regulatory Flexibility Act. See [5 U.S.C. 601(2)](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/5/601) (for purposes of Regulatory Flexibility analysis, the term “rule” means any rule for which the agency publishes a general notice of the proposed rulemaking).

Back to Citation 4. 5 U.S.C. 553(d).

Back to Citation 5. 5 U.S.C. 801.

Back to Citation [FR Doc. 2026-03955 Filed 2-26-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7545-01-P

Published Document: 2026-03955 (91 FR 9707)