Legal Status This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Legal Status

Proposed Rule

Categorical Exclusion Under the National Environmental Policy Act for Certain Terminations or Revocations of Water Power Licenses and Exemptions

A Proposed Rule by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on 02/24/2026

• 1.

1.
This document has a comment period that ends in 28 days.
(03/26/2026) View Comment Instructions

Thank you for taking the time to create a comment. Your input is important.

Once you have filled in the required fields below you can preview and/or submit your comment to the Energy Department for review. All comments are considered public and will be posted online once the Energy Department has reviewed them.

You can view alternative ways to comment or you may also comment via Regulations.gov at /documents/2026/02/24/2026-03657/categorical-exclusion-under-the-national-environmental-policy-act-for-certain-terminations-or.

It appears that you have attempted to comment on this document before
so we've restored your progress.
Start over.
1.
2. Comment * What is your comment about? Upload File(s) Note: You can attach your comment as a file and/or attach supporting
documents to your comment. Attachment Requirements.

Email this will NOT be posted on regulations.gov

Opt to receive email confirmation of submission and tracking number? Tell us about yourself! I am... * An Individual An Organization Anonymous First Name * Last Name * City Region State Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Puerto Rico Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Zip Country Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, U.S. Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Phone Organization Type * Company Organization Federal State Local Tribal Regional Foreign U.S. House of Representatives U.S. Senate Organization Name * You are filing a document into an official docket. Any personal
information included in your comment text and/or uploaded
attachment(s) may be publicly viewable on the web. I read and understand the statement above.

2. Preview Comment Please review the Regulations.gov privacy notice and user notice.
3. Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agencies Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Agency/Docket Number Docket No. RM26-7-000 CFR 18 CFR 380 Document Citation 91 FR 8799 Document Number 2026-03657 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 8799-8803 (5 pages) Publication Date 02/24/2026 Published Content - Document Details

• PDF Official Content
  • View printed version (PDF) Official Content
• Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agencies Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Agency/Docket Number Docket No. RM26-7-000 CFR 18 CFR 380 Document Citation 91 FR 8799 Document Number 2026-03657 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 8799-8803 (5 pages) Publication Date 02/24/2026 Published Content - Document Details
• Document Dates Published Content - Document Dates Comments Close 03/26/2026 Dates Text Comments are due March 26, 2026. Published Content - Document Dates

• Table of Contents Enhanced Content - Table of Contents This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
  headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
  This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
  has no substantive legal effect.

  • AGENCY:
  • ACTION:
  • SUMMARY:
  • DATES:
  • ADDRESSES:
  • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
  • SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
  • I. Background
  • II. Substantiation
  • IV. Proposed Revisions to NEPA Procedures
  • V. Request for Comments
  • VI. Regulatory Requirements
  • A. Information Collection Statement
  • B. Environmental Analysis
  • C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
  • D. Document Availability
  • List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 380
  • PART 380—REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
  • Footnotes Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

• Public Comments Enhanced Content - Public Comments Comments are being accepted - View Comment Instructions.

Enhanced Content - Public Comments
- Regulations.gov Data Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data Additional information is not currently available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

- Sharing Enhanced Content - Sharing Shorter Document URL https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-03657 Email Email this document to a friend Enhanced Content - Sharing

• Print Enhanced Content - Print
  • Print this document Enhanced Content - Print
• Document Statistics Enhanced Content - Document Statistics Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.

Page views 138
as of
02/26/2026 at 8:15 am EST Enhanced Content - Document Statistics
- Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats:

JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.

Enhanced Content - Other Formats
- Public Inspection Public Inspection This PDF is FR Doc. 2026-03657 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
02/23/2026 at 8:45 am.

It was viewed
34
times while on Public Inspection.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507. Learn more here.

Public Inspection
Published Document: 2026-03657 (91 FR 8799) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:

1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

Department of Energy

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

1. 18 CFR Part 380
2. [Docket No. RM26-7-000]

AGENCY:

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION:

Notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comments.

SUMMARY:

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) proposes to amend section 380.4 of its regulations implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to expand an existing Categorical Exclusion (CE). A CE describes a category of actions that a Federal agency has determined normally does not significantly affect the quality of the human environment, absent extraordinary circumstances, and so does not trigger NEPA's requirement to prepare an environmental document. The proposed revision would add a category of actions to an existing CE to include terminations or revocations of water power licenses and exemptions that will result in minor or no ground disturbing activity and minor or no changes in reservoir conditions and downstream flows.

DATES:

Comments are due March 26, 2026.

ADDRESSES:

Comments, identified by docket number, may be filed in the following ways. Electronic filing through http://www.ferc.gov, is preferred.

• Electronic Filing: Documents must be filed in acceptable native applications and print-to-PDF, but not in scanned or picture format.
• For those unable to file electronically, comments may be filed by USPS mail or by hand (including courier) delivery. ○ Mail via U.S. Postal Service Only: Addressed to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426.

○ Hand (Including Courier) Delivery: Deliver to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852.

The Comment Procedures section of this document contains more detailed filing procedures.

The public may access the related Draft Substantiation Record in the Commission's eLibrary system under Docket No. RM26-7-000, https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​eLibrary.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

CarLisa Linton (Technical Information), Office of Energy Projects, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-8416, CarLisa.Linton@ferc.gov.

Thomas Chandler (Legal Information), Office of the General Counsel, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6699, Thomas.Chandler@ferc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

1. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) proposes to amend section 380.4 of its regulations identifying categorically excluded projects or actions under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. in an ongoing effort to streamline the Commission's regulations. Section 380.4 of the Commission's regulations implementing NEPA identifies categories of actions or projects for which generally neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. [1 ] The Commission proposes to expand an existing Categorical Exclusion (CE) to add a category of actions for terminations or revocations of water power licenses and exemptions that will result in minor or no ground disturbing activity and minor or no changes in reservoir conditions and downstream flows.

( printed page 8800)

I. Background

1. NEPA requires Federal agencies to consider the environmental effects of their proposed actions in their decision-making process and to inform and engage the public in that process. For every proposed major federal action with a reasonably foreseeable significant effect on the quality of the human environment, the responsible federal agency shall issue an environmental impact statement (EIS). [2 ] For a proposed action with an unknown or lesser effect, the agency shall issue a more concise environmental assessment (EA) unless the agency finds that the proposed action is covered by a CE or is exempt from NEPA review under another law. [3 ] A CE describes “a category of actions that a Federal agency has determined normally does not significantly affect the quality of the human environment.” [4 ] Applying a CE allows an agency to satisfy NEPA's requirements more efficiently by reducing the resources spent analyzing proposals that normally do not have significant environmental effects.

2. In deciding whether a specific proposed action is excluded from case-specific NEPA review under a CE, the Commission and its staff independently evaluate environmental information supplied by an applicant or project sponsor, by Commission staff inspections or research, by other federal agencies, and by commenting stakeholders to determine whether circumstances indicate that a proposed action may be a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. [5 ] A list of such circumstances, often referred to as “extraordinary circumstances,” is set out in the Commission's regulations at 18 CFR 380.4(b)(2).

3. Agencies may establish a new CE if they have reliable data and resources, such as previous NEPA evaluations, to determine that the category of actions does not normally result in significant effects. [6 ]

4. Part I of the Federal Power Act (FPA) [7 ] establishes Commission jurisdiction over non-federal hydropower projects throughout the United States. The FPA makes it unlawful for any person, State, or municipality to build and operate a hydropower project subject to the Commission's jurisdiction unless they obtain a license [8 ] from the Commission.

5. A license may end by: voluntary surrender, [9 ] termination for failure to commence construction, [10 ] termination by implied surrender, [11 ] or revocation. [12 ] The Commission's existing regulations only specifically address the level of NEPA review for voluntary surrenders initiated by the licensee. [13 ] Section 380.5 of the Commission's regulations implementing NEPA states that an EA will normally be prepared first for “[s]urrender of water power licenses and exemptions where project works exist or ground disturbing activity has occurred . . . .” [14 ] The existing CE at section 380.4(a)(13) applies to the “surrender of water power licenses and exemptions where no project works exist or ground disturbing activity has occurred.” [15 ] The Commission's order either approving or denying the surrender indicates how the Commission complied with NEPA. The surrender becomes effective after the licensee fulfills any conditions for disposing of project works and restoring project lands that may be required by the Commission.

6. The Commission's existing regulations do not specifically address the levels of NEPA review for the following types of terminations or revocations:

• Termination: Commission-initiated termination after notice if there is failure to commence actual construction of the project works within the time prescribed by the Commission. [16 ]

• Implied Surrender Termination: Commission-initiated termination after notice when a licensee or exemptee, by action or inaction, has indicated its intent to abandon the project but has not filed a surrender application (e.g., the licensee has physically abandoned the project property, sold the project property without Commission authorization, dissolved its corporate or other legal identity, or has failed for several years to operate or maintain the project with no indication of doing so in the reasonably foreseeable future). [17 ]

• Revocation: Commission-initiated revocation under FPA § 31 when the licensee has knowingly violated a compliance order from the Commission despite a reasonable time to comply. [18 ]

• Termination for failure to commence construction results in no environmental effects. Typically, implied surrender termination or revocation leaves project facilities in place without further action that would alter the conditions of the project or affect the surrounding environment. When evaluating a project for implied surrender termination or revocation, Commission staff reviews the project compliance history, including previous dam safety inspection reports and compliance with the recommendations in them, to determine the current conditions at the site and coordinates with the appropriate state or local authority responsible for dam safety. Following termination or revocation, the project is removed from the Commission's FPA jurisdiction but remains subject to applicable federal, state, and local laws, including state regulatory programs for dam safety. [19 ] The Commission cannot conduct post-termination monitoring because it lacks jurisdiction following termination or revocation. [20 ]

( printed page 8801) 9. With this rulemaking, the Commission seeks to clarify its compliance with NEPA for terminations or revocations that would result in, at the most, limited changes to the environment. The changes to section 380.4(a)(13) will make, for certain proposed terminations and revocations, a categorical exclusion available as a form of review that may be used to comply with NEPA, providing more efficient oversight of hydropower projects and more efficient use of Commission resources.

II. Substantiation

1. The Commission may use various methods to gather and evaluate information to substantiate a proposed CE. [21 ] The amount of required information will vary based on a variety of factors (e.g., the type and number of actions previously authorized, the scale of possible effects, or the frequency of such actions). As detailed below, Commission experience has shown that few or no environmental effects result from implied surrender terminations or revocations of water power licenses and exemptions with minor or no ground disturbing activity and minor or no changes in reservoir conditions and downstream flows. Accordingly, Commission staff prepared a separate draft substantiation record based on environmental assessments of previously implemented actions. The draft substantiation record is summarized below and is available with this NOPR for public review and comment.

2. Commission staff considered all previous implied surrender terminations and revocations since 1978, the year that the Commission first promulgated regulations implementing NEPA. The Commission has never found a potentially significant effect from a termination or revocation such that an Environmental Impact Statement was required.

3. Commission staff prepared an EA in thirteen previous implied surrender termination or revocation proceedings. For implied surrender terminations, the licensee is almost always unresponsive, so Commission staff typically based the analysis in the EAs on site inspections completed by Commission staff and on any prior NEPA document or prior submitted documents, such as the environmental report that must accompany an application for a license, exemption, or amendment. For revocations, the licensee may either be unresponsive or be responsive but persistently in violation of the requirements of its license. Commission staff typically based the analysis in those EAs on the same sources used for implied surrender terminations. The EAs evaluated effects on geology and soils, water quality and quantity, aquatic resources, terrestrial resources, recreation, cultural resources, air quality, and threatened and endangered species, as relevant.

4. Six of the EAs recommended termination or revocation without further requirements on the licensee. [22 ] The EAs determined that the proposed actions would result in no changes to existing project facilities, no ground-disturbing activity, and no addition or change to the existing passive effect of the project works on the reservoir, flows, and environmental resources at the projects. These EAs found no potential effects on any environmental resource area.

5. The other seven EAs evaluated terminations and revocations with requirements for further actions to be conducted by the licensee required by the Commission's dam safety oversight program or by another federal agency to stabilize, repair, or remove project works. [23 ] Although the EAs identified more potential effects than in the cases requiring no further action by the licensee, the EAs uniformly concluded that the terminations and revocations would not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. [24 ]

6. These examples have informed the proposed CE. Consistent with the previous EAs, discussed in detail in the Substantiation Record, the Commission finds that “terminations or revocations of water power licenses that will result in minor or no ground disturbing activity and minor or no changes in reservoir conditions and downstream flows” normally do not significantly affect the quality of the human environment, absent extraordinary circumstances.

IV. Proposed Revisions to NEPA Procedures

1. The Commission proposes to expand the existing CE at 18 CFR 380.4(a)(13) to separate its clauses into subparts that will include the proposed CE for terminations and revocations of water power licenses and exemptions. The existing regulation states:

(a) General rule. Except as stated in paragraph (b) of this section, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement will be prepared for the following projects or actions:

• • * * * (13) Surrender and amendment of preliminary permits, and surrender of water power licenses and exemptions where no project works exist or ground disturbing activity has occurred and amendments to water power licenses and exemptions that do not require ground disturbing activity or changes to project works or operation;
• • * * * The proposed revised 18 CFR 380.4(a)(13) would state:

(13) Certain amendments, surrenders, terminations, and revocations of preliminary permits and water power licenses and exemptions:

(i) Amendments or surrenders of preliminary permits;

(ii) Amendments to water power licenses and exemptions that do not require ground disturbing activity or changes to project works or operation; (iii) Surrenders of water power licenses and exemptions where no project works exist or ground disturbing activity has occurred; or

(iv) Terminations or revocations of water power licenses and exemptions that will result in minor or no ground disturbing activity and minor or no changes in reservoir conditions and downstream flows;

1. The changes to section 380.4(a)(13) will make, for certain proposed terminations and revocations, a categorical exclusion available as a ( printed page 8802) form of review that may be used to comply with NEPA, providing more efficient oversight of hydropower projects.

V. Request for Comments

1. The Commission requests and encourages public comments on this notice of proposed rulemaking and the accompanying draft substantiation record. Comments may include any related matters or alternative proposals that commenters may wish to discuss. The Commission will consider comments it receives and provide responses in a final rule, with changes, if warranted.

2. Comments are due March 26, 2026. Comments must refer to Docket No. RM26-7-000 and must include the commenter's name, the organization they represent, if applicable, and their address in their comments. All comments will be placed in the Commission's public files and may be viewed, printed, or downloaded remotely as described in the Document Availability section below. Commenters on this proposal are not required to serve copies of their comments on other commenters.

3. The Commission encourages comments to be filed electronically via the eFiling link on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov. The Commission accepts most standard word processing formats. Documents created electronically using word processing software must be filed in native applications or print-to-PDF format and not in a scanned format. Commenters filing electronically do not need to make a paper filing.

4. Commenters that are not able to file comments electronically may file an original of their comment by USPS mail or by courier-or other delivery services. For submission sent via USPS only, filings should be mailed to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Office of the Secretary, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Submission of filings other than by USPS should be delivered to: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, MD 20852.

VI. Regulatory Requirements

A. Information Collection Statement

1. The Paperwork Reduction Act [25 ] requires each federal agency to seek and obtain the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval before undertaking a collection of information (i.e., reporting, recordkeeping, or public disclosure requirements) directed to ten or more persons or contained in a rule of general applicability. OMB regulations require approval of certain information collection requirements contained in final rules published in the Federal Register. This proposed rule does not impose new information collection requirements on any person or entity. The Commission is therefore not required to submit this rule to OMB for review.

B. Environmental Analysis

1. This proposed rule is procedural in its entirety and therefore does not require preparation of a NEPA analysis. NEPA does not require environmental analysis or documentation when establishing procedural guidance. The determination that establishing a CE does not require NEPA analysis and documentation has been upheld in Heartwood, Inc. v. U.S. Forest Service, 230 F.3d 947, 954-55 (7th Cir. 2000).

2. Moreover, this rulemaking falls within the Commission's category of actions for the promulgation of rules that are clarifying, corrective, or procedural, or that do not substantially change the effect of legislation or the regulations being amended. [26 ] This notice proposes to add a CE for certain terminations of hydropower authorizations. Because the proposed rule is procedural in nature and falls within this categorical exclusion, preparation of an Environmental Assessment or an Environmental Impact Statement is not required. Further, we note that this proposed rule only changes the default treatment under NEPA of certain terminations of hydropower authorizations, and such a change would not alter the environmental effects of the Commission's termination orders.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

1. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA) [27 ] generally requires a description and analysis of proposed rules that will have significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The RFA mandates consideration of regulatory alternatives that accomplish the stated objectives of a proposed rule and minimize any significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. [28 ] In lieu of preparing a regulatory flexibility analysis, an agency may certify that a proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. [29 ] The Small Business Administration's (SBA) Office of Size Standards develops the numerical definition of a small business. [30 ] The SBA size standard for hydroelectric power generation is based on the number of employees, including affiliates. [31 ] Under SBA's size standards, a hydroelectric power generator is small if, including its affiliates, it employs 750 or fewer people. [32 ]

2. If enacted, this proposed rule would apply to a number of entities, some of which may be small businesses, who hold a license or exemption from the Commission for a hydropower project. However, this proposed rule would have no effect on these entities, regardless of their status as a small entity or not, as the proposed rule imposes no action or requirement on those entities. Instead, this proposed rule would establish a new CE, altering the responsibilities and obligations only of the Commission and its staff under NEPA.

3. Accordingly, pursuant to section 605(b) of the RFA, the Commission certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

D. Document Availability

1. In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov).

2. From the Commission's Home Page on the internet, this information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket number field.

3. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission's website during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at (202) 502-6652 (toll free at 1-866-208-3676) or email at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502-8371, TTY (202) 502-8659. Email the Public Reference Room at public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.

List of Subjects in 18 CFR Part 380

• Environmental impact statements
• Reporting and recordkeeping requirements ( printed page 8803) By direction of the Commission.

Issued: February 19, 2026.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Secretary.

In consideration of the foregoing, the Commission proposes to amend part 380, chapter I, title 18, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:

PART 380—REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT

1. Revise § 380.4(a)(13) to read as follows:

§ 380.4 Projects or actions categorically excluded. (a) * * *

• * * * * (13) Certain amendments, surrenders, terminations, and revocations of preliminary permits and water power licenses and exemptions:

(i) Amendments or surrenders of preliminary permits;

(ii) Amendments to water power licenses and exemptions that do not require ground disturbing activity or changes to project works or operation;

(iii) Surrenders of water power licenses and exemptions where no project works exist or ground disturbing activity has occurred; or

(iv) Terminations or revocations of water power licenses and exemptions that will result in minor or no ground disturbing activity and minor or no changes in reservoir conditions and downstream flows;

Footnotes

1. 18 CFR 380.4.

Back to Citation 2. 42 U.S.C. 4336(b)(1).

Back to Citation 3. Id. 4336(a)(2), (b)(2).

Back to Citation 4. Id. 4336e(1).

Back to Citation 5. 18 CFR 380.4(b)(1).

Back to Citation 6.

                     Congress amended NEPA through the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 to authorize agencies to “adopt” categorical exclusions listed in another agency's NEPA procedures to be applied to the adopting agency's actions. Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, [Public Law 118-5](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/plaw/118/public/5), 137 Stat. 10 (2023); NEPA Section 109, [42 U.S.C. 4336c](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/42/4336c).

Back to Citation 7. 16 U.S.C. 791a-823g. Parts II and III of the FPA address electric transmission and wholesale sales rates and services.

Back to Citation 8.

                     Given that there are no distinctions between licenses and exemptions relevant to this proceeding, we will refer herein to “licenses” as including exemptions and “licensees” as including exemptees.

Back to Citation 9. 18 CFR 6.1, 6.2 (licenses), 4.95, 4.102 (exemptions).

Back to Citation 10. Id. 6.3 (licenses), 4.94(c), 4.106(c) (exemptions).

Back to Citation 11. Id. 6.4 (licenses), 4.94(a), 4.106(a) (exemptions).

Back to Citation 12. 16 U.S.C. 823b(b) (licenses and exemptions).

Back to Citation 13.

                     A licensee may request surrender for a variety of reasons, for example if the licensee determines that the project is no longer economical or if natural disasters have damaged or destroyed project facilities. 
                    See [16 U.S.C. 799](https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/16/799) (section 6 of the FPA provides the Commission authority to issue licenses and that licenses may be surrendered only upon mutual agreement between the licensee and the Commission).

Back to Citation 14. 18 CFR 380.5(b)(13).

Back to Citation 15. Id. 380.4(a)(13).

Back to Citation 16. 16 U.S.C. 806; 18 CFR 4.94(c), 4.106(c), 6.3; see also id. 375.308(e), (f) (delegating limited authority to the Director of the Office of Energy Projects to terminate licenses or revoke exemptions for failure to construct).

Back to Citation 17. 18 CFR 6.4, see, e.g., Standard License Article 30, Form L-1 (1975) (describing the triggers, process, and liabilities for implied surrender), https://www.ferc.gov/​industries-data/​hydropower/​administration-and-compliance/​standard-l-e-p-form-articles; 18 CFR 6.4 (same).

Back to Citation 18. 16 U.S.C. 823b(b).

Back to Citation 19. E.g., Leonard Lundgren, 10 FERC ¶ 61,270, at 61,524 (1980) (explaining that after termination of the license for a project on National Forest land, the project owner's continued use of the project dam and facilities for irrigation, without generating electricity, would be subject to the supervision of the U.S. Forest Service under a permit for continued occupancy of national forest lands by part of the project); Pub. Util. Dist. No. 1 of Okanogan Cnty., 169 FERC ¶ 61,215, at P 19 (2019) (explaining that Commission staff had coordinated with the Washington State Department of Ecology, Dam Safety Division, before terminating a license for failing to construct new facilities at the existing Enloe Dam).

Back to Citation 20.

                     The Commission may, however, provide that a voluntary surrender will not be effective until specified conditions are met. *See PacifiCorp,* 181 FERC ¶ 61,122, at P 64 (2022).

Back to Citation 21.

                     
                    See 
                     Council on Environmental Quality, *Memorandum Establishing, Applying, and Revising Categorical Exclusions under NEPA* 6-10 (2010), *[https://ceq.doe.gov/​docs/​ceq-regulations-and-guidance/​NEPA_​CE_​Guidance_​Nov232010.pdf](https://ceq.doe.gov/docs/ceq-regulations-and-guidance/NEPA_CE_Guidance_Nov232010.pdf);* Office of Energy Projects, FERC, *Staff Guidance Manual on Implementation of The National Environmental Policy Act* 4-5 (June 2025), *[https://www.ferc.gov/​media/​staff-guidance-manual-implementation-national-environmental-policy-act-june-2025s](https://www.ferc.gov/media/staff-guidance-manual-implementation-national-environmental-policy-act-june-2025s).*

Back to Citation 22.

                     See the discussion in the Substantiation Record of the Whittelsey Dam Hydroelectric Project No. 10522-024; Gilman Stream Hydroelectric Project No. 7473-013; Hammeken's Powerhouse Canal Project No. 9647-003; Blackstone Mill Hydroelectric Project No. 11426-003; Appleton Trust Project No. 9300-018; and Lowell Atlantic Hydroelectric Project No. 5946-007.

Back to Citation 23.

                     See the discussion in the Substantiation Record of the Upper Watertown Dam Project No. 9974-040, -048; Star Milling and Electric Minor Water Power Project No. 11291-023; Bannister Mill Project No. 8656-007; 29-Mile Creek Project No. 7931-021; Slaughterhouse Gulch Project No. 6375-006; Tyrone  Project No. 6624-009; and Mechanicville Hydroelectric Project No. 6032-041.

Back to Citation 24.

                     Commission staff identified the implied surrender termination for the Mechanicville Hydroelectric Project No. 6032-041 as an outlier. *Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.,* 98 FERC ¶ 61,227 (2002) (including Environmental Assessment). The EA evaluated termination with a requirement for the licensee to repair and stabilize the dam and powerhouse. The EA concluded that the activities could reintroduce polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) pollution from the riverbed into the water column. *Id.* EA at G.2. This potential for more than a minor change to reservoir conditions and downstream flows would have placed the termination outside the scope of the proposed CE.

Back to Citation 25. 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521.

Back to Citation 26. 18 CFR 380.4(a)(2)(ii).

Back to Citation 27. 5 U.S.C. 601-612.

Back to Citation 28. Id. 603(c).

Back to Citation 29. Id. 605(b).

Back to Citation 30. 13 CFR 121.101.

Back to Citation 31. Id.

Back to Citation 32. Id. 121.201, subsector 221.

Back to Citation [FR Doc. 2026-03657 Filed 2-23-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P

Published Document: 2026-03657 (91 FR 8799)