State AG Defends Firearms Act in Lawsuit

WA Attorney General News Releases

Filed March 4th, 2026

Detected March 4th, 2026

Summary

Washington State Attorney General Nick Brown is defending the constitutionality of the state's Firearms Industry Responsibility Act (FIRA) in a King County Superior Court case, Olen v. Precise Shooter. The AG's office filed an amicus brief to support the law, which holds gun sellers responsible for preventing sales to individuals at risk of self-harm.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The Washington State Attorney General's office has filed an amicus brief in the case of Olen v. Precise Shooter, defending the constitutionality of the 2023 Firearms Industry Responsibility Act (FIRA). The lawsuit alleges that the gun retailer, Precise Shooter, sold a firearm to a teen daughter despite parents warning the shop she was at risk of self-harm, leading to her death by suicide. The retailer claims FIRA is unconstitutional, preempted by federal law (PLCAA) and violates the Second Amendment. The AG's brief argues FIRA is a commonsense gun safety measure that aligns with federal law and does not infringe on Second Amendment rights.

This action highlights the AG's commitment to defending state firearm safety laws against legal challenges. Retailers in Washington must ensure compliance with FIRA's requirements for enforcing safeguards against sales to individuals at substantial risk of harm. While the AG's office is not a party, their defense of FIRA in this case sets a precedent for future challenges and reinforces the legal standing of such state-level regulations. Failure to comply with FIRA could lead to legal action and potential penalties, though specific penalties are not detailed in this release.

What to do next

Review the AG's amicus brief in Olen v. Precise Shooter to understand arguments defending FIRA.
Ensure compliance with Washington's Firearms Industry Responsibility Act (FIRA) regarding sales to individuals at risk of self-harm.
Monitor ongoing litigation and potential future interpretations of FIRA and PLCAA.

Source document (simplified)

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Mar 4 2026

Parents allegedly told gun shop their teen child was at risk of self-harm; they sold her a gun anyway

Attorney General Nick Brown has sought leave to file an amicus (or “friend of the court”) brief to defend the constitutionality of the 2023 state Firearms Industry Responsibility Act (FIRA) in a King County Superior Court case, Olen v. Precise Shooter. In this case, parents allege that they called Precise Shooter, a gun shop, to beg them not to transfer a gun to their teen daughter, as she was at risk of self-harm. Precise Shooter allegedly refused this request, and she died by suicide shortly after obtaining the weapon from the retailer.

The parents have sued under FIRA, which requires gun sellers to enforce procedures and safeguards to prevent the sale or distribution of a firearm to a person whom the seller has reasonable cause to believe is at substantial risk of using it to harm themselves or others. This is one of the first cases brought under the law. The firearms retailer incorrectly claims that FIRA is unconstitutional under federal law.

While the AG’s office isn’t a party to this case, the retailer has challenged the constitutionality of a state law, which our office is responsible for defending. Our brief rebuts the retailer’s arguments and explains that FIRA is constitutional and aligns with existing federal law.

“Under Washington law, firearm retailers can’t ignore people who are reaching out to protect family members who are at imminent risk of self-harm,” said AG Brown. “This retailer is not only trying to shirk responsibility for their alleged actions, they’re also trying to take away gun safety protections from all Washingtonians, which would open the door for future tragedies like this one.”

Precise Shooter argues that FIRA is preempted by the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). However, PLCAA does not prevent states from passing commonsense gun safety measures like FIRA. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the constitutionality of a similar New York state law in 2025. Precise Shooter also argues that FIRA violates the Second Amendment, but the Second Amendment does not guarantee a right to sell guns, a fact that courts have repeatedly affirmed.

The Attorney General’s Office supported FIRA’s passage in 2023, and will continue to defend commonsense firearms protections against spurious challenges like this one.

Read the brief.

News Releases 2026 News Releases 2025 News Releases 2024 News Releases 2023 News Releases 2022 News Releases 2021 News Releases 2020 News Releases 2019 News Releases 2018 News Releases 2017 News Releases 2016 News Releases 2015 News Releases 2014 News Releases 2013 News Releases 2012 News Releases 2011 News Releases 2010 News Releases 2009 News Releases 2008 News Releases 2007 News Releases 2006 News Releases 2005 News Releases 2004 News Releases 2003 News Releases 2002 News Releases 2001 News Releases 2000 News Releases 1999 News Releases 1998 News Releases 1997 News Releases 1996