Changeflow GovPing Government SEC Bars Ejiro Ode Okuma for Fraud and Misappro...
Urgent Enforcement Removed Final

SEC Bars Ejiro Ode Okuma for Fraud and Misappropriation

Favicon for www.sec.gov SEC Administrative Proceedings
Filed February 25th, 2026
Detected February 26th, 2026
Email

Summary

The SEC has barred Ejiro Ode Okuma from associating with any regulated entity following findings of fraud and misappropriation of over $9 million from a client. A final judgment was entered against Okuma, permanently enjoining him from future violations of securities laws.

What changed

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued an order barring Ejiro Ode Okuma from the securities industry. This action follows a final judgment entered against Okuma, permanently enjoining him from violating key provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. The SEC's complaint alleged that between 2022 and 2025, Okuma misappropriated over $9 million from an elderly client while acting as an investment adviser, engaging in conduct that operated as a fraud and deceit.

This enforcement action means Okuma is prohibited from associating with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Any future application for reentry into the industry will require approval from the appropriate self-regulatory organization. This serves as a strong warning to investment professionals regarding their fiduciary duties and the severe consequences of fraud and misappropriation.

Source document (simplified)

UNITED ST ATES OF AMERI CA Befo re the SECURITI ES AND E XCHANGE COM MISSION SECURITI ES EXCH ANGE ACT OF 1 934 Relea se No. 104888 / February 25, 2026 INVESTME NT ADVIS ERS ACT OF 194 0 Relea se No. 6947 / Febru ary 25, 2026 ADMINIST RATIVE PROCEE DING File No. 3- 22598 In th e Mat ter o f EJIRO ODE OKUMA, Respo ndent. ORDER I NSTITUT ING ADMINIST RATIVE PROCEEDING S PURSUANT TO SECT ION 15(b) OF THE S ECURITIE S EXCH ANGE ACT OF 1 934 AND SE CTION 203 (f) OF THE INVESTM ENT ADVISERS ACT OF 1 940, MAKI NG FINDINGS, AND IMPOS ING REM EDIAL SANCTIONS I. The Securities and Exchange Commiss ion (“Com mission”) deems i t appro priate and in th e public interest th at public administrative pro ceedings be, and hereby a re, instit uted pursuant to Sectio n 15 (b) o f the Secu rit ies E xchan ge A ct of 1 934 (“Ex chang e Act ”) an d Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) against Ejiro Ode Okuma (“Res pond ent ”). II. In anticipation o f the insti tution of thes e proceedings, Respondent has submitted an O ffer of Settlement (the “Offer”) which the Commission has determined to accept. Solely for th e purpose of these p roceedings and any other p roceedings br ought by or on b ehalf of th e Commission, or t o which the Commi ssion is a part y, Respondent admit s the Com mission’s jurisdiction ov er him and the subject matte r of thes e proceedings, and the findi ngs contained in Section III.2 b elow, and consents to the entry o f this Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Se ction 15(b) of the Securiti es Exchange Act of 1934 and S ection 203(f) o f the Investment Advis ers Act of 1940, M aking Finding s, and Imposing R emedial Sanction s (“Order”), as set fort h bel ow.

2 III. On the basis of t his Order and Respondent ’s Offer, the Commissi on finds tha t: 1. From 2010 un til May 4, 2 023, Okuma wa s a regi ster ed represe ntative an d investm ent adviser representat ive associated with a brok er - dealer and investment adviser that is registered w ith the Commission. Beginn ing on May 5, 2 023, Oku ma was a r egiste red repres ent ative and i nvest ment adv iser r epr esent ativ e of anot her firm that operated as a bran ch office for a broker - dealer and investment adviser that is re gistered w ith the C ommission. Okuma, 4 3 years old, is a resident of S myrna, Georgia. 2. On February 18, 202 6, a final judgm ent was entere d by consent against Okum a, permanently enjoi ning him from futu re violations of Section 17 (a) (1) of th e S ecuri ties Act o f 193 3 (“Secu rit ies A ct”), S ecti on 1 0(b) o f the Ex chang e Act and Rul e s 10b -5 (a) and (c) thereu nder, an d Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act, a s set forth in the judgment entered in the civil action entitled Securities and Exch ange Commissi on v. Ejiro Ode Okuma, Civil Action N umber 1:26 - CV - 561, in the United States Dis trict Court for the Northern District of Georgia. 3. The Commission’s complaint alleged that, between 2022 and 20 25, Okuma misappropriated more than $9 million from an elderly client who relied almost exclusively on Okuma for all fina ncial matter s. In doing so, and whi le acting as an inv estment adviser, Okuma engaged in a va riety of conduct which operated as a fraud and deceit on his client. IV. In view of th e foregoing, the Comm ission deems it appropriate and in the pu blic interest to impose the sanction s agreed to in R espondent Oku ma ’s Of fer. Accordingly, it is h ereby ORDER ED pursuant to S ection 15(b)(6) of the Ex change Act, and Section 20 3(f) of the Adviser s Act, tha t Respon dent Okuma be, and he reby is barred from associ atio n wit h any brok er, deal er, in vest ment adv iser, mun icip al s ecurit ies dealer, mun icip al advisor, trans fer agent, or nation ally recogni zed statisti cal rating organi zation. Any application for reentry by the Resp ondent will be made to the app ropri ate s elf - regulatory organi zation, or if th ere is none, t o the Comm ission by cont acting the Divisi on of Enforc ement ’s Offi ce of Chief C ouns el at E NF - Reentry@sec.gov, and will be subj ect to the applicable laws a nd regulations go verning the reentry proc ess. Reentry m ay be condition ed upon a number of facto rs, including, but not limited to, compliance with the Commissi on’s order and

3 payment of any or all of t he following: (a) any disgorgement o r civil penalti es ordered by a Court against the Respon dent in any action brought b y the Commi ssion; (b) any ar bitrat ion awar d rel ated to the conduct that served as the basis for the Commission order; (c) any s elf - regulator y organization arbitration award to a customer, w hether or not r elated to the conduct that s erved as the basis for the Commission order; and (d) any restitution ord er by a self - regulatory organization, whether or not r elated to the condu ct that serve d as the b asis for the Commi ssion order. By the Commission. Vanessa A. Count ryman Secret ary

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Securities and Exchange Commission
Filed
February 25th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Broker-dealers Financial advisers
Geographic scope
National (US)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Securities
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Investment Advisers Act Fraud

Get Government alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when SEC Administrative Proceedings publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.