SEC v. Ryan Squillante - Insider Trading Enforcement
Summary
The SEC announced a final consent judgment against Ryan Squillante for insider trading. Squillante was ordered to pay disgorgement and prejudgment interest totaling $250,765, which was satisfied by a criminal fine in a parallel case. The SEC alleges he used confidential information to trade in at least ten securities.
What changed
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has obtained a final consent judgment against Ryan Squillante in its civil enforcement action, Case No. 25-cv-01457, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. The judgment permanently enjoins Squillante from violating Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. He is liable for disgorgement of $216,965 and $33,800 in prejudgment interest, which are deemed satisfied by a criminal fine imposed in a parallel criminal case. The SEC's complaint, filed September 5, 2025, alleged Squillante used confidential employment information to illegally profit approximately $216,965 by trading in the securities of at least ten public companies.
This action signifies a final resolution of the SEC's civil claims against Squillante, reinforcing the consequences of insider trading. While the monetary penalties are satisfied by the criminal fine, the permanent injunction serves as a significant deterrent. Regulated entities and individuals in the financial industry should be aware that the SEC actively pursues and obtains judgments against those engaging in insider trading, emphasizing the importance of robust compliance programs and adherence to securities laws to prevent the misuse of material non-public information.
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Government alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.