Changeflow GovPing Government Lacy v. Lacy - Louisiana Court of Appeal Opinion
Routine Enforcement Removed Final

Lacy v. Lacy - Louisiana Court of Appeal Opinion

Favicon for www.courtlistener.com Louisiana Court of Appeal
Filed March 12th, 2026
Detected March 12th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, denied a writ application in the case of Marqueta Lacy v. Stephen Lacy. One judge noted the writ application's failure to comply with uniform rules regarding opposition or statement of no opposition.

What changed

The Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit, issued an opinion denying a writ application in the case of Marqueta Lacy v. Stephen Lacy, with docket number 2026 CW 0196. The denial was based on procedural grounds, as one judge noted the application failed to include the respondent's opposition or a statement that no opposition was filed, violating Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-3(C)(9).

This ruling signifies the court's decision on the writ application, effectively upholding the lower court's proceedings or denying further review at this stage. Legal professionals involved in this case should note the procedural deficiency cited and ensure future filings adhere strictly to appellate court rules. No compliance actions are required for external entities as this is a specific court ruling.

Source document (simplified)

Jump To

Top Caption Combined Opinion The text of this document was obtained by analyzing a scanned document and may have typos.

Support FLP

CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project
, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.

Please become a member today.

Join Free.law Now

March 12, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note

Marqueta Lacy v. Stephen Lacy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Combined Opinion

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

MARQUETA LACY NO. 2026 CW 0196

VERSUS

STEPHEN LACY MARCH 12, 2026

In Re: Stephen Lacy, applying for Supervisory writs, 22nd
Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No.
2025-10337.

BEFORE: MILLER, EDWARDS, AND FIELDS, JJ.
WRIT DENIED.

SMM
BDE

Fields, J., would not consider the writ. The writ application
does not include a copy of respondent's Opposition thereto or a
Statement that no opposition was filed in the district court in
violation of Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-
3(C) (9).

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

I de. Aa VV

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
\ FOR THE COURT

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Federal and State Courts
Filed
March 12th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Courts Legal professionals
Geographic scope
State (Louisiana)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Judicial Administration
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Family Law Appellate Procedure

Get Government alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Louisiana Court of Appeal publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.