Changeflow GovPing Financial Research Working Paper on Client Clearing, Netting Effic...
Routine Guidance Added Final

Working Paper on Client Clearing, Netting Efficiency, and Pricing

Favicon for www.financialresearch.gov OFR Publications
Published February 19th, 2026
Detected March 13th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Office of Financial Research published a working paper analyzing client clearing services in centrally cleared markets. The paper, based on confidential data, demonstrates how client clearing improves netting efficiency for dealers and offers pricing advantages to clients, enhancing market access and competition.

What changed

This working paper from the Office of Financial Research (OFR) examines the economic impacts of client clearing services, which now dominate risk management in centrally cleared markets. Utilizing confidential transaction-level data for credit default swaps, the study finds that client clearing enhances netting efficiency for dealers and provides pricing advantages for clients. The adoption of central clearing encourages clients to broaden their dealer relationships, thereby improving market access and fostering competition. Clients' reliance on clearing member firms, particularly those with strong credit quality and established relationships, is highlighted as a key factor in accessing central counterparties. The paper also notes that while offering these services benefits member firms through improved client retention and pricing power, clients' dependence on clearing members can create operational fragilities during periods of market stress, especially for those with limited member relationships.

The findings are particularly relevant given recent clearing mandates, especially in U.S. Treasury markets. While this is a working paper and not a regulatory rule, compliance officers in financial institutions involved in clearing services should review the analysis to understand the operational and market structure implications. The paper suggests that firms offering client clearing services can gain competitive advantages, but must also manage the associated operational risks. Regulated entities should consider how these insights align with their current risk management frameworks and client relationship strategies, especially in light of evolving regulatory requirements.

What to do next

  1. Review the OFR working paper on client clearing services.
  2. Assess current client clearing operations for netting efficiency and pricing advantages.
  3. Evaluate operational risks associated with client reliance on clearing members.

Source document (simplified)

Clearing Markets and Client Clearing Services

By Salil Gadgil, Robin Lumsdaine, and Mark Paddrik

Published: February 19, 2026

View paper

Abstract

This paper examines client clearing, which now accounts for the majority of risk managed in centrally cleared markets. Using confidential transaction-level data on credit default swaps, we show that client clearing enhances netting efficiency for dealers and generates pricing advantages for clients. Adoption of central clearing leads clients to expand their sets of dealer trading partners, thereby enhancing market access and competition. To access central counterparties, clients depend on clearing member firms, favoring those with stronger credit quality and with whom they have established trading relationships. Offering these services creates spillover benefits for member firms’ market making activity by improving client retention and pricing power. Clients’ reliance on clearing members creates operational fragilities under stress, especially for those with limited member relationships. Our findings provide novel insights about the economic consequences of client clearing and are
particularly relevant given recent clearing mandates, most notably in U.S. Treasury markets.

View related blog

Keywords: Central Clearing, Client Relationships, Counterparty Risk, Market Structure, Clearing Agents

JEL Classifcation Numbers: G23,G28,L14

Back to Working Papers

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Various Federal Agencies
Published
February 19th, 2026
Instrument
Guidance
Legal weight
Non-binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Broker-dealers Fund managers Financial advisers
Geographic scope
National (US)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Securities
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Market Structure Risk Management Financial Stability

Get Financial Research alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when OFR Publications publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.