Changeflow GovPing Financial Regulation ECB Fines J.P. Morgan for Misreporting Capital ...
Urgent Enforcement Amended Final

ECB Fines J.P. Morgan for Misreporting Capital Requirements

Favicon for www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu ECB Banking Supervision
Filed February 19th, 2026
Detected March 6th, 2026
Email

Summary

The European Central Bank (ECB) has imposed two penalties totaling €12.18 million on J.P. Morgan SE for misreporting capital requirements between 2019 and 2024. The bank incorrectly calculated risk-weighted assets due to misclassifications and exclusions in credit risk and credit valuation adjustment risk reporting.

What changed

The European Central Bank (ECB) has sanctioned J.P. Morgan SE with two administrative penalties totaling €12.18 million for serious reporting breaches concerning capital requirements. The breaches, classified as 'severe' and 'moderately severe', occurred over multiple quarters between 2019 and 2024. J.P. Morgan SE misclassified corporate exposures, leading to the application of lower risk weights for credit risk, and unduly excluded certain transactions when calculating risk-weighted assets for credit valuation adjustment risk. These miscalculations resulted in the bank reporting higher capital ratios than it should have, hindering the ECB's ability to accurately assess the bank's risk profile and capital strength.

This enforcement action highlights the critical importance of accurate regulatory reporting and robust internal controls. J.P. Morgan SE's internal processes failed to detect these breaches in a timely manner, indicating significant deficiencies. While the bank may challenge the decision before the Court of Justice of the European Union, the ECB's decision underscores the potential for substantial financial penalties for non-compliance with reporting rules. Regulated entities should review their internal controls and reporting mechanisms for credit risk and credit valuation adjustment risk to ensure compliance with ECB regulations.

What to do next

  1. Review internal controls for credit risk and credit valuation adjustment risk reporting.
  2. Verify the accuracy of risk-weighted asset calculations and capital ratio reporting.
  3. Ensure compliance with all applicable banking rules and reporting requirements.

Penalties

€12.18 million in administrative penalties

Source document (simplified)

  • PRESS RELEASE

ECB sanctions J.P. Morgan for misreporting capital requirements

19 February 2026

  • J.P. Morgan breached reporting rules on credit risk and credit valuation adjustment risk
  • ECB imposes two penalties amounting to €12.18 million The European Central Bank (ECB) has imposed two administrative penalties totalling €12.18 million (€12,180,000) on J.P. Morgan SE after the bank reported wrongly calculated risk-weighted assets.

Between 2019 and 2024, the bank reported lower risk-weighted assets than it should have done. This occurred because, for 15 consecutive quarters, the bank misclassified corporate exposures and applied a lower risk-weight for credit risk to them than what banking rules prescribe. The bank also, for 21 consecutive quarters, unduly excluded certain transactions when calculating risk-weighted assets for its credit valuation adjustment risk, which captures the risk that the counterparty to a derivative contract may default.

The bank committed both breaches with serious negligence, driven by evident deficiencies in its internal processes. The bank’s internal controls did not detect the breaches in a timely manner.

The bank reported wrongly calculated figures to the ECB, therefore preventing the ECB from having a comprehensive view of its risk profile. Risk-weighted assets are a measure of the risks a bank has on its books. They serve as a basis for banks to calculate their capital requirements. As a result of underestimating its risk-weighted assets, the bank reported higher capital ratios than it should have done. Capital ratios are key indicators of a bank’s capital strength and its ability to absorb losses.

When deciding on the amount of a penalty to sanction a bank, the ECB applies its Guide to the method of setting administrative pecuniary penalties. Out of the severity categories “minor”, “moderately severe”, “severe”, “very severe” and “extremely severe”, the ECB classified the credit risk breach and the credit valuation adjustment risk breach, respectively, as “severe” and “moderately severe”. More details on sanctions imposed by the ECB are available on our supervisory sanctions web page.

The bank may challenge the ECB’s decision before the Court of Justice of the European Union.

For media queries, please contact Andrea Zizola , tel.: +49 69 1344 6551.

Notes

  • The ECB’s power to impose sanctions stems from Article 18 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions.
  • The Decision imposing a sanction may be challenged before the Court of Justice of the European Union under the conditions and within the time limits provided for in Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. CONTACT ## European Central Bank

Directorate General Communications

Media contacts

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Various EU Institutions
Filed
February 19th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Substantive

Who this affects

Applies to
Banks
Geographic scope
EU-wide

Taxonomy

Primary area
Banking
Operational domain
Compliance
Topics
Capital Requirements Risk Management Regulatory Reporting

Get Financial Regulation alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when ECB Banking Supervision publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.