Legal Status This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.

The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.

The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.

Legal Status

Proposed Rule

You may be interested in this newer document that published on 03/01/2019 with action 'Proposed rule; notice of public hearing.' View Document

Decertification of Representatives

A Proposed Rule by the National Mediation Board on 01/31/2019

• 1.

1.

• Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency National Mediation Board Agency/Docket Number Docket No. C-7198 CFR 29 CFR 1203 29 CFR 1206 Document Citation 84 FR 612 Document Number 2019-00406 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 612-614
  (3 pages) Publication Date 01/31/2019 RIN 3140-AA01 Published Content - Document Details

• PDF Official Content

  • View printed version (PDF) Official Content

• Document Details Published Content - Document Details Agency National Mediation Board Agency/Docket Number Docket No. C-7198 CFR 29 CFR 1203 29 CFR 1206 Document Citation 84 FR 612 Document Number 2019-00406 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 612-614
  (3 pages) Publication Date 01/31/2019 RIN 3140-AA01 Published Content - Document Details

• Document Dates Published Content - Document Dates Comments Close 04/01/2019 Dates Text Submit comments on or before April 1, 2019. A public hearing will be held at 10 a.m. in Washington, DC at a date and location to be announced later. Published Content - Document Dates

• Table of Contents Enhanced Content - Table of Contents This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
  headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
  This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
  has no substantive legal effect.

  • AGENCY:
  • ACTION:
  • SUMMARY:
  • DATES:
  • ADDRESSES:
  • FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
  • SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
  • Executive Order 12866
  • Regulatory Flexibility Act
  • Paperwork Reduction Act
  • List of Subjects
  • 29 CFR Part 1203
  • 29 CFR Part 1206
  • PART 1203—APPLICATIONS FOR SERVICE
  • PART 1206—HANDLING REPRESENTATION DISPUTES UNDER THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT Enhanced Content - Table of Contents

• Related Documents Enhanced Content - Related Documents FederalRegister.gov uses the agency dockets published with the document to display related documents.

| Docket No. C-7198
(3 Documents) | | | |
| --- | | | |
| Date | | Action | Title |
| | 2019-07-26 | Final rule. | Decertification of Representatives |
| | 2019-03-01 | Proposed rule; notice of public hearing. | Representation Procedures and Rulemaking Authority |
| | 2019-01-31 | Proposed rule with requests for comments. | Decertification of Representatives |

Enhanced Content - Related Documents

• Public Comments Enhanced Content - Public Comments Comments are no longer being accepted. See DATES for details.

Enhanced Content - Public Comments
- Regulations.gov Data Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data Additional information is not currently available for this document.

Enhanced Content - Regulations.gov Data

- Sharing Enhanced Content - Sharing Shorter Document URL https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2019-00406 Email Email this document to a friend Enhanced Content - Sharing

• Print Enhanced Content - Print
  • Print this document Enhanced Content - Print
• Document Statistics Enhanced Content - Document Statistics Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.

Page views 1,841
as of
03/14/2026 at 2:15 pm EDT Enhanced Content - Document Statistics
- Other Formats Enhanced Content - Other Formats This document is also available in the following formats:

JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.

Enhanced Content - Other Formats
- Public Inspection Public Inspection This PDF is FR Doc. 2019-00406 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
01/30/2019 at 8:45 am.

If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507. Learn more here.

Public Inspection
Published Document: 2019-00406 (84 FR 612) This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Document Headings Document headings vary by document type but may contain
the following:

1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

National Mediation Board

1. 29 CFR Parts 1203 and 1206
2. [Docket No. C-7198]
3. RIN 3140-AA01

AGENCY:

National Mediation Board.

ACTION:

Proposed rule with requests for comments.

SUMMARY:

The National Mediation Board (NMB or Board) is proposing to amend its regulations to provide a straightforward procedure for the decertification of representatives. The Board believes this change is necessary to fulfill the statutory mission of the Railway Labor Act, protecting employees' right to select their representative. This change will ensure that each employee has a say in their representative and eliminate unnecessary hurdles for employees who no longer wish to be represented.

DATES:

Submit comments on or before April 1, 2019. A public hearing will be held at 10 a.m. in Washington, DC at a date and location to be announced later.

ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. C-7198, by any of the following methods:

— Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

— Agency Website: http://www.nmb.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

— Email: legal@nmb.gov. Include Docket No. C-7198 in the subject line of the message.

— Fax: (202) 692-5085.

— Mail and Hand Delivery: National Mediation Board, 1301 K Street NW, Ste. 250E, Washington, DC 20005.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.nmb.gov, including any personal information provided.

Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to http://www.nmb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mary Johnson, General Counsel, National Mediation Board, (202) 692-5040, legal@nmb.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Railway Labor Act (RLA), 45 U.S.C. 151 et seq. establishes the NMB whose functions, among others, are to administer certain provisions of the RLA with respect to investigating disputes as to the representative of a craft or class. In accordance with its authority under 45 U.S.C. 152, Ninth, the Board has considered changes to its rules to better facilitate the statutory mission to investigate representation disputes “among a carrier's employees as to who are the representatives of such employees.”

Currently, while employees have the ability to decertify a representative under the RLA, the process to decertify is unnecessarily complex and convoluted. By failing to have in place a straight-forward process for decertification of a representative, the Board is maintaining an unjustifiable hurdle for employees who no longer wish to be represented and failing to fulfill the statutory purpose of “freedom of association among employees.” 45 U.S.C. 151a(2).

Unlike the National Labor Relations Act, the RLA has no statutory provision for decertification of a bargaining representative. The Supreme Court, however, has held that, under Section 2, Fourth, 45 U.S.C. 152, Fourth, employees of the craft or class “have the right to determine who shall be the representative of the group or, indeed, whether they shall have any representation at all.” Bhd. of Railway and Steamship Clerks v. Assoc. for the Benefit of Non-Contract Employees, 380 US 650, 670 (1965)(ABNE). In ABNE, the Court further noted that the legislative history of the RLA supports the view that employees have the option of rejecting collective representation. Id. at 669. citing Hearings on H.R. 7650, House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., 34-35. In International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Bhd. of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Circuit), stated that “it is inconceivable that the right to reject collective representation vanishes entirely if the employees of a unit once choose collective representation. On its face that is a most unlikely rule, especially taking into account the inevitability of substantial turnover of personnel within the unit.” 402 F.2d 196, 202 (1968), See also Russell v. National Mediation Board, 714 F.2d 1332 (1983).

Under its current procedures, the NMB allows indirect rather than direct decertification. The Board does not allow an employee or a group of employees of a craft or class to apply for an election to vote for their current representative or for no union. Employees who wish to become unrepresented must follow a more convoluted path to an election because of the Board's requirement of the “straw man.” This straw man requirement means that if a craft or class of employees want to decertify, they must find a person willing to put their name up, i.e. “John Smith,” and then explain to at least fifty percent of the workforce that John Smith does not want to represent them, but if they want to decertify they have to sign the card authorizing him to represent them. Thus, in order to become unrepresented, employees are required to first sign an authorization card to have a strawman step in to represent them. In the resulting election, the ballot options will include the names of the current representative; John Smith, the strawman applicant; “no union;” and an option to write in the name of another ( printed page 613) representative. To decertify, employees have to vote for no representation.

It is NMB's statutory mandate to protect employees' freedom to choose a representative. There is, however, no statutory basis for the additional requirement of a straw man where employees seek to become unrepresented. Both courts and the Board have recognized that inherent in the right to representation is the right to be unrepresented. Accordingly, the Board proposes changing its rules to simplify the decertification process and put decertification on an equal footing with certification. Employees may submit authorization cards to decertify their current representative. The wording on the card must be unambiguous and clearly state the intent to no longer be represented by the current union. The showing of interest requirement will be the same showing of interest required for a certification election—at least 50 percent of the craft or class.

The necessity of a straw man will be eliminated, and the ballot will no longer include a strawman representation choice. Once it is determined that the showing of interest is valid and sufficient, the Board will authorize the election with the incumbent and the no representation option, along with a write-in option. The Board's existing run-off rules will apply.

Successful decertification, like certification, is a challenging and significant undertaking by employees with a substantial impact on the workplace for both employees and their employer. In the Board's view, the changes in the employee-employer relationship that occur when employees become represented, change representative or become unrepresented require similar treatment. For this reason, the Board proposes extending the two year time limit on applications in Sec. 1206.4(a) to decertifications as well as certifications. The other time limits set forth in 1206.4 will remain unchanged.

Member Puchala dissents from the Board majority's action in approving the proposed rule.

Executive Order 12866

This rule is not a significant rule for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the NMB certifies that these regulatory changes will not have a significant impact on small business entities. This rule will not have any significant impact on the quality of the human environment under the National Environmental Policy Act.

Paperwork Reduction Act

The NMB has determined that the Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because this interim regulation does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget.

List of Subjects

29 CFR Part 1203

• Air carriers
• Labor management relations
• Labor unions
• Railroads

29 CFR Part 1206

Air carriers, Labor management relations, Labor union, Railroads.

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the National Mediation Board proposes to amend 29 CFR Chapter X as set forth below:

PART 1203—APPLICATIONS FOR SERVICE

1. The authority citation for part 1203 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 44 Stat. 577, as amended; 45 U.S.C. 151-163.

1. Revise § 1203.2 to read as follows:

§ 1203.2 Investigation of representation disputes. Applications for the services of the National Mediation Board under section 2, Ninth, of the Railway Labor Act to investigate representation disputes among carriers' employees may be made on printed forms NMB-3, copies of which may be secured from the Board's Representation and Legal Department or on the internet at www.nmb.gov. Such applications and all correspondence connected therewith should be filed in duplicate and the applications should be accompanied by signed authorization cards from the employees composing the craft or class involved in the dispute. The applications should show specifically the name or description of the craft or class of employees involved, the name of the invoking organization or individual seeking decertification, the name of the organization currently representing the employees, if any, and the estimated number of employees in each craft or class involved. The applications should be signed by the chief executive of the invoking organization, some other authorized officer of the organization, or an individual seeking decertification. These disputes are given docket numbers in the series “R”.

PART 1206—HANDLING REPRESENTATION DISPUTES UNDER THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT

1. The authority citation for part 1206 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 44 Stat. 577, as amended; 45 U.S.C. 151-163.

1. Amend § 1206.1 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows

§ 1206.1 Run-off elections. * * * * * (b) In the event a run-off election is authorized by the Board, the two options which received the highest number of votes cast in the first election shall be placed on the run-off ballot. No blank line on which voters may write in the name of any organization, individual, or no representation will be provided on the run-off ballot.

• * * * * 3. Amend § 1206.2 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:

§ 1206.2 Percentage of valid authorizations required to determine existence of a representation dispute. (a)Upon receipt of an application requesting that an organization or individual be certified as the representative of any craft or class of employees, or to decertify the current representative and have no representative, a showing of proved authorizations (checked and verified as to date, signature, and employment status) from at least fifty (50) percent of the craft or class must be made before the National Mediation Board will authorize an election or otherwise determine the representation desires of the employees under the provisions of section 2, Ninth, of the Railway Labor Act.

• * * * * 4. Amend § 1206.4 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:

§ 1206.4 Time Limits on Applications * * * * * (a) For a period of two (2) years from the date of a certification or decertification covering the same craft or class of employees on the same carrier, and

• * * * * 5. Redesignate §§ 1206.5 through 1206.7 as §§ 1206.6 through 1206.8 and add new § 1206.5 to read as follows:

§ 1206.5 Decertification of Representatives. Employees who no longer wish to be represented may seek to decertify the current representative of a craft or class in a direct election. The employees must follow the procedure outlines in § 1203.2.

( printed page 614) Dated: January 28, 2019.

Mary L. Johnson,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2019-00406 Filed 1-30-19; 8:45 a.m.]

BILLING CODE 7550-01-P

Published Document: 2019-00406 (84 FR 612)