Bullock v. Hamby - Civil Rights Appeal

4th Circuit Daily Opinions

Filed March 3rd, 2026

Detected March 4th, 2026

Summary

The Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's decision to dismiss a prisoner's civil rights lawsuit for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The unpublished opinion clarifies that such decisions, while not binding precedent, uphold the procedural requirements for inmate litigation.

View original document View source feed page

What changed

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Ronnie B. Bullock's lawsuit filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The dismissal was based on Bullock's failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. The court found no reversible error in the district court's decision, upholding the requirement for inmates to complete internal grievance procedures before pursuing legal action.

This decision, while unpublished and therefore not binding precedent in the Fourth Circuit, reinforces the importance of adhering to administrative exhaustion requirements for civil rights claims brought by incarcerated individuals. Litigants must ensure all available administrative avenues are pursued and completed before seeking judicial review. Failure to do so will likely result in dismissal, as demonstrated in this case.

What to do next

Review internal grievance procedures for compliance with exhaustion requirements.

Source document (simplified)

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF AP PEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25 - 6708 RONNIE B. BUL LOCK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JAMES HAMBY, Dentist; D. BALL, N.P., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of V irginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, Senior District Judge. (7:23 - cv - 00337 - MF U - JCH) Submitted: February 26, 202 6 Decided: March 3, 2026 Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAU M, Circuit Judg es, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie B. Bullock, App ellant Pro Se. Nathan Henry Schn etzler, FRITH, ANDER SON & PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia; Rosalie Fessier, Brittany Elizabeth Shipley, TIMBERLAKE SMITH, Staunton, V irginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding p recedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM: Ronnie B. Bulloc k appeals the d istrict court ’ s order granting Defendant’s motions for summary j udgment and dismissing Bullock’s 42 U.S.C. § 198 3 for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’ s order. Bullock v. Hamby, No. 7:23 - cv - 00337 - MFU- JCH (W.D. Va. Aug. 5, 2025). We dispense with oral arg ument because the facts and legal contentions are adeq uately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED