Court Opinion Errata Sheet Amends Case Details
Summary
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an errata sheet to amend a previously issued opinion. The amendment corrects the name of the Postmaster General on the cover sheet and renumbers footnotes. This action is procedural and does not alter the substantive outcome of the case.
What changed
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has issued an errata sheet to amend its opinion in case No. 23-1914, Orlando González Tomasini, et al. v. Louis DeJoy, et al. The amendment, dated February 2, 2026, corrects the cover sheet by replacing "LOUIS DEJOY" with "DAVID P. STEINER" as the Postmaster General, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2). It also involves renumbering footnotes and removing a specific footnote from page 3.
This is a procedural correction to an existing court opinion. For legal professionals involved in this specific case or those monitoring appellate court procedures, it is important to note the updated party information and footnote references. No new compliance obligations or deadlines are imposed by this errata sheet; it merely clarifies details within the existing judicial record.
Source document (simplified)
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 23 - 1914 ORLANDO GONZÁLEZ TOMASINI, Plaintiff, Appellant, JULIETTE IRIZARRY MIRANDA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP GONZÁLEZ IRIZARRY; K O G, Minor; V D R, Minor; S G I, Minor; M A R, Minor, Plaintiffs, v. LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster; UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendants, Appellees. ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on February 2, 2026, is amended as follows: On the cover sheet, replace "LOUIS DEJOY" with "DAVID P. STEINER" and insert footnote "" with " Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2), Postmaster General David P. Steiner is automatically substituted for former Postmast er General Louis DeJoy as Appellees." Renumber the other footnote w ith "*" On p age 3, remove footnote 1 a nd renumber the remaining footnotes accordingly.
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Federal Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when 1st Circuit Opinions publishes new changes.