Winchell v. Social Security Commissioner - Social Security Review
Summary
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California filed a new civil case, Winchell v. Social Security Commissioner, on February 20, 2026. The case involves a complaint for judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security regarding disability benefits.
What changed
A new civil case, Winchell v. Social Security Commissioner, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on February 20, 2026, with case number 3:26-cv-01523. The complaint, filed by Cynthia A. Winchell, seeks judicial review of a decision made by the Commissioner of Social Security concerning disability insurance benefits (DIWC/DIWW).
This filing initiates a legal process for challenging the Commissioner's decision. The court will review the administrative record to determine if the Commissioner's decision was supported by substantial evidence and followed proper legal standards. The plaintiff has also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, indicating a request to waive court fees due to financial hardship. No specific compliance actions are required for other entities at this stage, as this is an individual legal challenge.
Source document (simplified)
Winchell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:26-cv-01523 Location: San Francisco Case Type: Civil Case Basis: U.S. Government Defendant Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Date Filed:
February 20, 2026
Last Filing Date:
February 20, 2026
View Publicly Available Documents Case Summary No summary of this case is available
Recent Filings
| Date Filed | Docket Number | Document Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 02-20-26 | 1 | COMPLAINT For Judicial Review of Decision of Commissioner of Social Security against Commissioner of Social Security. Filed by Cynthia A. Winchell. (Sackett, Harvey) |
| 02-20-26 | 2 | MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cynthia A. Winchell. (Sackett, Harvey) |
| 02-20-26 | 4 | SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER: (far, COURT STAFF) |
Return to top
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Federal Courts alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when NDCA Recently Filed Cases publishes new changes.