East Branch Hydroelectric Project Jurisdictional Determination
Summary
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission received a jurisdictional determination request from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation for the unlicensed East Branch Hydroelectric Project on the East Branch of the Missisquoi River in Orleans County, Vermont. FERC is soliciting public comments, motions to intervene, and protests regarding whether the project requires federal licensing under Section 23(b)(1) of the Federal Power Act. Comments must be filed within 45 days, by May 11, 2026.
What changed
On February 4, 2026, FERC received a jurisdictional determination request from Vermont DEC for the East Branch Hydroelectric Project (Docket UL26-5-000), located on the East Branch of the Missisquoi River in Orleans County, Vermont. The Commission is investigating whether the project requires licensing under Section 23(b)(1) of the Federal Power Act based on grounds that the project is located on a Commerce Clause stream, was constructed after August 26, 1935, and is connected to the interstate transmission grid.
Any interested party may submit comments, protests, or motions to intervene in accordance with 18 CFR 385.210, 211, and 214 by May 11, 2026. Parties should use FERC's eFiling system or submit paper filings to the Secretary. Only those who file a motion to intervene may become parties to the proceedings. Electric utilities and energy developers with similar projects should monitor this proceeding to understand how FERC applies Section 23(b)(1) jurisdictional criteria.
What to do next
- Submit comments, protests, or motions to intervene by May 11, 2026 using FERC's eFiling system
- Register at FERC's website to receive notifications of new filings in Docket UL26-5-000
- Review project documentation at ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp using docket number UL26-5-000
Source document (simplified)
Content
On February 4, 2026, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) received a request from the Vermont Department
of Environmental Conservation (Vermont DEC) for a jurisdictional determination for the unlicensed East Branch Hydroelectric
Project. The project is located on the East Branch of the Missisquoi River in Orleans County, Vermont.
Pursuant to section 23(b)(1) of the Federal Power Act (FPA), (1) a non-federal hydroelectric project must be licensed if it: (a) is located on a navigable water of the United States; (b)
occupies lands or reservations of the United States; (c) utilizes surplus water or waterpower from a government dam; (2) or (d) is located on a stream over which Congress has Commerce Clause jurisdiction, is constructed or modified on or after
August 26, 1935, and affects the interests of interstate or foreign commerce.
Regarding condition (d) above, for purposes of FPA section 23(b)(1), headwaters and tributaries of navigable waters are Commerce
Clause streams; (3) “post-1935” construction or modification at an existing project includes enlarging a project, such as increasing size of the
reservoir, height of the dam, or generating capacity; (4) and projects that generate energy for transmission on the interstate grid affect interstate commerce. (5)
Vermont DEC requests that the Commission examine its jurisdiction for the East Branch Project on the grounds that the project
is located on a stream over which Congress has Commerce Clause jurisdiction, was constructed after August 26, 1935, and is
connected to the transmission grid. (6)
In response to Vermont DEC's requests, Commission staff is investigating the jurisdictional status of the East Branch Hydroelectric
Project (UL26-5-000). A copy of Vermont DEC's request may be viewed on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number, UL26-5-000. You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676
or email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, for TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
The Commission is soliciting comments, motions to intervene, and protests in these proceedings. Comments, motions to intervene,
and protests must be filed by 45 days from notice or May 11, 2026, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Anyone may submit comments,
a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of Rules and Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210,
211, and 214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission will consider all protests or comments filed,
but only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rule may become a party to the proceedings.
Any comments, protests, or motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified comment date.
The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file comments, protests, and motions to intervene using the Commission's
eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ You must include your name and contact information at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, (866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, you may submit a paper copy. Submissions
sent via the U.S. Postal Service must be addressed to: Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE, Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426. Submissions sent via any other carrier must be addressed to: Debbie-Anne
A. Reese, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The first page
of any filing should include Docket Number UL26-5-000.
For further information, please contact Rebecca Martin at (202) 502-6012 or rebecca.martin@ferc.gov.
(Authority: 18 CFR 2.1)
Dated: March 26, 2026. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2026-06199 Filed 3-30-26; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Footnotes
(1) 16 U.S.C. 817(1).
(2) A project that meets condition (a), (b), or (c) is not required to be licensed if it holds a still valid pre-1920 federal
permit.
(3) FPC v. Union Electric Co., 381 U.S. 90, 94-96 (1965).
(4) See, e.g., L.S. Starrett Co. v. FERC, 650 F.3d 19, 26-27 (1st Cir. 2011); Cent. Vt. Pub. Serv. Corp., 54 FERC ¶ 61,132, at 61,434 (1991) (citing Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. FPC, 557 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1977); Aquenergy Systems, Inc., 29 FERC ¶ 61,026 (1984)).
(5) See FPC v. Union Elec. Co., 381 U.S. at 94-95. Moreover, it is well settled that small hydroelectric projects that are connected to the interstate grid,
even if they have no interstate sales, affect interstate commerce by displacing power from the grid, and the cumulative effect
of the national class of these small projects is significant for purposes of FPA section 23(b)(1). See Habersham Mills v. FERC, 976 F.2d 1381, 1384-85 (11th Cir. 1992).
(6) Vermont DEC February 4, 2026 Request for Determination of Commission Jurisdiction for the East Branch Hydroelectric Project
at 2 and 7.
Download File
Download
CFR references
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Energy alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when Regs.gov: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission publishes new changes.