Changeflow GovPing Courts State v. Monaco - Criminal Case Affirmation
Routine Enforcement Amended Final

State v. Monaco - Criminal Case Affirmation

Favicon for www.courts.oregon.gov Oregon Supreme Court Opinions
Filed March 12th, 2026
Detected March 13th, 2026
Email

Summary

The Oregon Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court in the case of State v. Monaco. The court's decision upholds the lower courts' rulings in this criminal matter.

What changed

The Oregon Supreme Court, in its decision dated March 12, 2026, affirmed the prior rulings of the Court of Appeals and the Multnomah County Circuit Court in the case State of Oregon v. Ryan Thomas Monaco. The specific legal issues and reasoning behind the affirmation are detailed within the court's opinion, which was argued and submitted in September 2025.

This ruling finalizes the legal proceedings at the state level for this case. For legal professionals involved in criminal defense or prosecution in Oregon, this decision may serve as precedent for similar cases. No new compliance actions or deadlines are imposed on regulated entities as this is a judicial affirmation of existing judgments.

Source document (simplified)

of 42 No. 13 March 12, 2026 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. RYAN THOMAS MONACO, Petitioner on Review. (CC 17CR48942) (CA A177164) (SC S071665) En Banc On review from the Court of Appeals.* Argued and submitted September 5, 2025. Neil F. Byl, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon Public Defense Commission, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review. Also on the brief was Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section. Erica L. Herb, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review. Also on the brief were Dan Rayfield, Attorney General, and Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General. BUSHONG, J. The decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are affirmed. DeHoog, J., concurred and filed an opinion. ______________ * Appeal from Multnomah County Circuit Court, Michael A. Greenlick, Judge. 336 Or App 684, 561 P3d 650 (2024). 2 State v. Monaco

Source

Analysis generated by AI. Source diff and links are from the original.

Classification

Agency
Federal and State Courts
Filed
March 12th, 2026
Instrument
Enforcement
Legal weight
Binding
Stage
Final
Change scope
Minor

Who this affects

Applies to
Legal professionals Criminal defendants
Geographic scope
State (Oregon)

Taxonomy

Primary area
Criminal Justice
Operational domain
Legal
Topics
Appellate Procedure Criminal Law

Get Courts alerts

Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get alerts for this source

We'll email you when Oregon Supreme Court Opinions publishes new changes.

Free. Unsubscribe anytime.