Urizar-Mota v. US - Errata Corrections
Summary
The First Circuit issued errata correcting Urizar-Mota v. US (No. 25-1131), making formatting corrections to a previously issued opinion from March 27, 2026. Changes include punctuation fixes (SF 95 to SF-95), quotation mark adjustments, case number formatting, and minor word replacements. No changes to legal holdings or parties' substantive rights.
What changed
The First Circuit issued an errata sheet correcting formatting issues in Urizar-Mota v. US, No. 25-1131. Corrections include: page 6 line 9 (SF 95 to SF-95), page 13 line 14 (quotation mark fix), page 14 line 5 (case name), page 19 line 3 (case number formatting from CV13-1726PHXDGC to CV13-1726 PHX), page 25 line 6 (homeowner to homemaker), and page 48 line 6 (who to which). All corrections are typographical or formatting in nature.
Legal professionals and courts referencing this opinion should use the corrected version. No action is required by any party. The corrections do not affect the legal substance of the opinion or the rights of any party to the litigation.
Source document (simplified)
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 25-1131
LUCIA URIZAR-MOTA; SERGIO REYES, individually and p.p.a. of S.R., W.R., and G.R.; DELMY REYES; S.R.; W.R.; G.R., Plaintiffs, Appellees,
UNITED STATES, Defendant, Appellant, ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on March 27, 2026, is amended as follows: On page 6, line 9 replace "SF 95" with "SF-95". - On page 13, line 14 replace "Ouellette v. Beaupre" with " "Ouellette v. Beaupre". On page 14, line 5 replace "Wojciechowicz v. United States" with "Wojciechowicz v. United States". One page 18, line 22 replace "see, e.g." with "see, e.g.". One page 19, line 3 replace "No. CV13-1726PHXDGC" with "No. CV13-1726 PHX". On page 25, line 6 replace "homeowner" with "homemaker". On page 48, line 6 replace "who" with "which".
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when 1st Circuit Opinions publishes new changes.