Mario Williams v. State of Florida - Criminal Appeal
Summary
The Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, affirmed the lower court's decision in the case of Mario Williams v. State of Florida. The appellate court issued its opinion on March 26, 2026, upholding the prior ruling without significant new commentary.
What changed
The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District, has affirmed the lower court's decision in the criminal appeal case of Mario Williams v. State of Florida. The court's disposition, dated March 26, 2026, indicates that the prior ruling stands without modification. The case bears the docket number 4D2024-3299.
This affirmation means that the legal proceedings and outcomes from the lower court have been upheld. For the appellant, Mario Williams, this signifies the conclusion of the appellate review process with the appellate court agreeing with the trial court's judgment. No further actions are required by regulated entities as this is a specific case outcome, not a new regulation or guidance.
Source document (simplified)
Jump To
Top Caption Disposition Combined Opinion
Support FLP
CourtListener is a project of Free
Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Members help support our work and get special access to features.
Please become a member today.
March 26, 2026 Get Citation Alerts Download PDF Add Note
Mario Williams v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
- Citations: None known
- Docket Number: 4D2024-3299
Disposition: Affirmed
Disposition
Affirmed
Combined Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
MARIO WILLIAMS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2024-3299
[March 26, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Barbara Duffy, Judge; L.T. Case No.
062021CF008944A88810.
Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Siobhan H. Shea, Assistant
Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Paul Patti, III,
Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
LEVINE, FORST and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Courts & Legal alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when FL District Court of Appeal Opinions publishes new changes.