Federal Courts

Rettick v. VTA - Employment Discrimination Case

A new civil case, Rettick v. VTA, was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves allegations of employment discrimination under federal question jurisdiction, specifically related to the Americans with Disabilities Act.

A.G. v. United States - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, A.G. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case number is 3:26-cv-02139. The initial filings include a complaint, proposed summons, a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.

K.S. v. US Government - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, K.S. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against the U.S. Government and the Federal Bureau of Prisons, with a filing fee of $405.

Simply Retail Inc. v. Levine et al - Trade Secrets Litigation

A new civil case, Simply Retail Inc. v. Levine et al, has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case, identified by docket number 3:26-cv-02131, is based on the Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016. The initial filings include the complaint, a certificate of interested entities, and proposed summons.

Ji v. Bondi et al - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, Ji v. Bondi et al, was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves the U.S. Government as a defendant and is based on the Administrative Procedures Act. The filing fee was $405.

M.C. v. United States of America - Civil Case Filing

A new civil case, M.C. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al, was filed on March 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint against the U.S. Government and includes filings for proposed summons and a motion to maintain plaintiff anonymity.

Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. John Doe - Subpoena for Identity

The U.S. District Court for Massachusetts granted Strike 3 Holdings, LLC's motion to serve a third-party subpoena on an ISP before a Rule 26(f) conference. This allows Strike 3 to identify an unknown defendant, John Doe, allegedly involved in copyright infringement of adult films.

Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe - IP Address Subpoena

The District Court of Massachusetts granted Strike 3 Holdings, LLC leave to serve a third-party subpoena on an ISP to identify a John Doe defendant accused of copyright infringement. The court found the discovery warranted prior to a Rule 26(f) conference to allow for service of process.

Andrew Dill v. Southcoast Visiting Nurse Association, Inc. - Vaccine Retaliation Claim Dismissed

The District Court of Massachusetts dismissed Andrew Dill's vaccine retaliation claim against his former employer, Southcoast Visiting Nurse Association, Inc. The court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint.

Terrance Reeves v. Pete Hegseth - Employment Discrimination Appeal

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded a district court decision in Terrance Reeves v. Pete Hegseth. The court affirmed the dismissal of race discrimination and hostile work environment claims but vacated the summary judgment on the retaliation claim, remanding it for further proceedings.