Recent changes
Willie James Atmore v. Bibb County Law Enforcement Center - Case Dismissal
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia dismissed the case of Willie James Atmore v. Bibb County Law Enforcement Center due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with court orders regarding the signing of his complaint. The dismissal was without prejudice.
M.C.C.C. v. Warden, STEWART DETENTION CENTER - Immigration Habeas Corpus
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia granted a petitioner's habeas corpus relief, ordering the Stewart Detention Center to provide a bond hearing for an immigration detainee. The court found the detainee was not subject to mandatory detention under the cited statutes.
J.M.G. v. Warden, Stewart Detention Center - Immigration Habeas Corpus
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia granted a petitioner's habeas corpus relief, ordering the Warden of Stewart Detention Center to provide the detainee with a bond hearing. The court found the detainee was not subject to mandatory detention under the cited statutes.
Sayda Ayala o/b/o E.S.R-M. v. Warden - Habeas Corpus
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia received an application for habeas corpus relief filed by Sayda Ayala on behalf of E.S.R-M., an individual detained at Stewart Detention Center. The court found insufficient information to grant Ms. Ayala next friend status.
Hagy v. Southern Insurance Company of Virginia - Insurance Dispute
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia granted Plaintiffs' motion to withdraw admissions and set aside the Defendant's motion for summary judgment in the case of Hagy v. Southern Insurance Company of Virginia. The court denied the defendant's motion without prejudice.
GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal - Denial of Yearsley Protection Not Immediately Appealable
The Supreme Court ruled in GEO Group, Inc. v. Menocal that a pretrial order denying a federal contractor 'Yearsley protection' is not immediately appealable. The Court held that the denial of this defense is not an immunity from suit, and thus does not qualify for interlocutory review under the collateral-order doctrine.
Villarreal v. Texas - Qualified Testimony Discussion Ban Affirmed
The Supreme Court affirmed a conviction in Villarreal v. Texas, holding that a qualified order prohibiting a testifying defendant from discussing their testimony during an overnight recess does not violate the Sixth Amendment. This ruling clarifies the balance between a defendant's right to counsel and the integrity of trial testimony.
United African-Asian Abilities Club v. Comeragh Prospect, Llc - Civil Rights Case
A civil rights case was filed on February 25, 2026, by the United African-Asian Abilities Club against Comeragh Prospect, LLC. The case, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleges violations of federal question and civil rights laws related to accommodations. The filing fee was $405.
S.T. v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) - Civil Case Filing
A civil case, Case Number 3:26-cv-01649, was filed against the United States of America, specifically the Federal Bureau of Prisons, on February 25, 2026. The filing includes a complaint, proposed summons, and a consent to proceed before a US Magistrate Judge.
Edwards v. Santa Cruz Courts - Civil Case Filing
A new civil case, Edwards v. Santa Cruz Courts et al., was filed on February 25, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The case involves a complaint for Mandamus and Other relief, with a recent filing of a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
Last 7 days
Most active sources
Browse Categories
Activity
Get daily alerts
Morning digest delivered to your inbox. Free.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
25 monitored sources
Get Federal Courts alerts
Daily digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get Federal Courts alerts
We'll email you when new federal courts changes are detected.