FCA proposes flexible suitability reviews, replaces annual requirement
Summary
The FCA published Consultation Paper CP26/10 on March 25, 2026, proposing to replace the current mandatory annual suitability review requirement for ongoing investment advice with a more flexible periodic review obligation. Under the proposed changes, firms providing investment advice to retail customers would determine review frequency based on client needs, risk profiles, and investment complexity, consistent with Consumer Duty obligations. Comments on the consultation close June 17, 2026.
What changed
The FCA proposes to fundamentally restructure suitability review requirements under COBS 9 and 9A. The current prescriptive annual review requirement for MiFID investments and insurance-based investment products would be replaced with a principles-based periodic review framework. Firms would need to determine appropriate review frequency by reference to client needs, characteristics, objectives, risk attitudes, and the nature and complexity of investments. For retail clients, review cycles must align with Consumer Duty obligations.
Firms providing ongoing investment advice to retail customers should submit comments to FCA Consultation Paper CP26/10 by June 17, 2026. Internally, compliance teams should begin developing methodologies for calibrating review frequencies across different client segments, products, and service models. Firms should document their rationale for periodic review decisions and consider how to demonstrate compliance with Consumer Duty when setting review cycles. Until clearer market norms emerge, some firms may choose to maintain near-annual review practices for higher-risk portfolios.
What to do next
- Submit comments to FCA Consultation Paper CP26/10 by June 17, 2026
- Develop internal methodology for determining appropriate periodic review frequency by client segment
- Update suitability review policies to reflect principles-based approach aligned with Consumer Duty
Source document (simplified)
April 6, 2026
FCA Changes to Ongoing Advice Rules
Edward Lister, Andrew Wingfield Proskauer - Regulatory & Compliance + Follow Contact LinkedIn Facebook X Send Embed
Introduction
On 25 March 2026, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published Consultation Paper 26/10 ‘ Simplifying the Pensions & Investment Advice Rules’.
As the name suggests, the Consultation Paper seeks stakeholder feedback on a proposed consolidation and simplification of the current rules on pensions and investment advice, which are found in the Conduct of Business Sourcebook (COBS).
The FCA’s proposed amendments are intended to deliver on two related commitments.
First, the FCA proposes to consolidate and simplify the current suitability and advice rules in COBS, moving away from certain prescriptive requirements and placing greater reliance on principles-based regulation, including the Consumer Duty. As part of this exercise, the FCA proposes to bring together the existing COBS suitability regimes (in COBS 9 and 9A) into a more unified framework and to give firms greater clarity on how simpler forms of investment advice may be provided.
Secondly, as set out in Chapter 3 of the Consultation Paper, the FCA proposes to replace the current requirement for annual suitability reviews with a more flexible obligation to carry out periodic suitability reviews based on clients’ needs and circumstances.
This note focuses on the second of these commitments, and is therefore relevant to firms providing ongoing investment advice to retail customers.
Ongoing investment advice
Under the current FCA rules, firms ongoing assessments of suitability in relation to MiFID investments or insurance-based investment products must carry out such assessments at least annually. CP26/10 proposes to replace this prescriptive annual requirement with a more flexible obligation to carry out suitability assessments on a periodic basis.
Under the proposed approach, firms would be required to determine the appropriate frequency of review by reference to: (i) the client’s needs, characteristics and objectives; (ii) the client’s attitude to risk and ability to bear risk; and (iii) the nature, complexity and risk profile of the relevant investments or services. In the case of retail clients, firms would also need to set their review cycle consistently with their obligations under the Consumer Duty.
These proposed changes are consistent with the FCA’s broader objective of making the investment advice framework more proportionate, easier to navigate and better aligned with consumer needs. In removing the current prescriptive requirement for annual suitability reviews, the FCA is seeking to give firms greater flexibility to tailor ongoing advice services to the circumstances of different clients. The FCA also considers that a more flexible model could reduce costs for some consumers, release adviser capacity and support wider access to ongoing advice.
Challenges for firms
Notwithstanding the above, the proposals could give rise to practical challenges for firms.
In particular, firms would need to determine how best to calibrate review frequency across different client groups, products and service models. Some firms may feel comfortable adopting a less frequent review cycle for lower-risk portfolios or simpler products. Others may be more cautious about moving too far from current practice until clearer market norms and supervisory expectations emerge.
Accordingly, although the direction of travel is positive, the practical benefits of the proposed regime may become clear only over time as firms gain confidence in how the new flexibility will operate in practice.
Next steps
The FCA’s consultation process remains open until 22 May 2026, and the FCA intends to publish a Policy Statement containing its finalised body of rules in Q4 2026. These timings may change depending upon the nature and extent of the feedback received.
Related Posts
- FCA Consults on Client Categorisation and Conflicts of Interest Regimes
- FCA Review on Consolidation in the Financial Advice and Wealth Management Sector
- FCA Starts Consultation on UK Motor Finance Consumer Redress Scheme
Latest Posts
- FCA Changes to Ongoing Advice Rules
- SEC Releases Commission Interpretation on Application of Securities Laws to Digital Assets See more »
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
Attorney Advertising.
©
Proskauer - Regulatory & Compliance
Written by:
Proskauer - Regulatory & Compliance Contact + Follow Edward Lister + Follow Andrew Wingfield + Follow more less
PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA
- ✔ Increased readership
- ✔ Actionable analytics
- ✔ Ongoing writing guidance Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra
Published In:
Consultation Papers + Follow Consumer Protection Laws + Follow Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) + Follow Financial Services Industry + Follow Investment + Follow Pensions + Follow Proposed Rules + Follow Public Consultations + Follow Regulatory Reform + Follow Retail Investors + Follow Finance & Banking + Follow Insurance + Follow Securities + Follow more less
Proskauer - Regulatory & Compliance on:
"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"
Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra: Sign Up Log in ** By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.* - hide - hide
Named provisions
Related changes
Source
Classification
Who this affects
Taxonomy
Browse Categories
Get Banking & Finance alerts
Weekly digest. AI-summarized, no noise.
Free. Unsubscribe anytime.
Get alerts for this source
We'll email you when JD Supra Finance & Banking publishes new changes.