3 Magpies, Inc. v. UEP Investments 2, LLC - Unjust Enrichment Appeal

The Illinois Appellate Court, Fourth District, reversed a trial court's judgment in favor of 3 Magpies, Inc. (plaintiff) against UEP Investments 2, LLC (defendant). The plaintiff had sued for unjust enrichment, seeking $34,000 for kitchen equipment installed during their restaurant lease. The appellate court found that the lease agreement clearly stated that any alterations or improvements made by the lessee would become the property of the lessor upon lease expiration, thus negating the claim of unjust enrichment.

This decision means that the defendant landlord is not required to compensate the plaintiff tenant for the kitchen hood and sinks. The appellate court's ruling, filed under Supreme Court Rule 23, is not precedent except in limited circumstances. No specific compliance actions are required for other entities, as this is a specific case resolution. The original trial court award of $34,000 in damages has been overturned.